Re: If you say it enough, it will be believed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blah3
If you read the article its not that confusing
There are 81 court cases to date based on the 2020 election
In 45 cases President Trump was the plaintiff
In 34 cases President Trump is not the plaintiff
In 2 cases President Trump is the defendant
In 72 cases illegal voting is alleged
In ZERO of the 72 cases where illegal voting is alleged has evidence been allowed to be presented
No this isn’t one of those 9 cases. But is that really important.
I have written that the document the article is written on contains multiple errors that the author is using to make claims about. He either doesn’t proof read OR is being deliberately misleading.
Re: If you say it enough, it will be believed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Laxdad24
So it is a conspiracy. Why else wouldn’t the courts hear these cases?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Beats me, but there is no denying that they didn't hear them.
Re: If you say it enough, it will be believed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LittleG
From document:
Pennsylvania- Alleged Voter Fraud (Yes) - Poll observers to be allowed at voting centres early.
This is why I don’t trust the gatewaypundit.... the case doesn’t alleged voter fraud.
Other entries show case dismissed BUT also active.
Poor document that the article is based off has lead to poor conclusions.
There are multiple cases.
The only reason I posted it, it cause it has the list of the cases and if they were heard and decided on the merits or not.
Re: If you say it enough, it will be believed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NCRAVEN
There are multiple cases.
The only reason I posted it, it cause it has the list of the cases and if they were heard and decided on the merits or not.
When a case is settled out of court by both sides agreeing to a change (Eg. Observers being allowed 10 feet from counting) there is no need for evidence OR are you saying that a case like that needs to have evidence presented before you classify it as being ‘decided on merit’?
Re: If you say it enough, it will be believed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LittleG
When a case is settled out of court by both sides agreeing to a change (Eg. Observers being allowed 10 feet from counting) there is no need for evidence OR are you saying that a case like that needs to have evidence presented before you classify it as being ‘decided on merit’?
What case(s) are you talking about?
Re: If you say it enough, it will be believed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LittleG
No this isn’t one of those 9 cases. But is that really important.
I have written that the document the article is written on contains multiple errors that the author is using to make claims about. He either doesn’t proof read OR is being deliberately misleading.
It’s important because it will determine if the ‘mistake’ you found is actually a mistake in the article
Re: If you say it enough, it will be believed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NCRAVEN
What case(s) are you talking about?
There are multiple cases listed as being ‘dismissed by mutual agreement’. These don’t need to have evidence presented.
Re: If you say it enough, it will be believed.
Dominion Voting is suing Rudy Guiliani for 1.3 billion.
Rudy plans to counter sue, but more over, he's saying he'll be able to examine the voting machines used on election day in the discovery phase.
I hope this happens so we can find out the truth and move on either way.
Re: If you say it enough, it will be believed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LittleG
There are multiple cases listed as being ‘dismissed by mutual agreement’. These don’t need to have evidence presented.
Then no, I wouldn't be talking about those cases.
Re: If you say it enough, it will be believed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blah3
It’s important because it will determine if the ‘mistake’ you found is actually a mistake in the article
How about doing some reading of his document that is his ‘evidence’.
Re: If you say it enough, it will be believed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LittleG
How about doing some reading of his document that is his ‘evidence’.
How about you point out the mistakes you say are there???
Re: If you say it enough, it will be believed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NCRAVEN
Dominion Voting is suing Rudy Guiliani for 1.3 billion.
Rudy plans to counter sue, but more over, he's saying he'll be able to examine the voting machines used on election day in the discovery phase.
I hope this happens so we can find out the truth and move on either way.
Dominion are going to bankrupt Rudy. Dominion will be happy to show their machines were not used to commit voter fraud.... They could also just present all the times they were accused of fraud in places where they don’t actually have voting machines....