Watching a Cowboys game is painful. The announcers spend at least half the game talking about Romo's issues. Usually announcers are endless ass-kissers. Not in Romo's case. That guy has very few fans
Printable View
Watching a Cowboys game is painful. The announcers spend at least half the game talking about Romo's issues. Usually announcers are endless ass-kissers. Not in Romo's case. That guy has very few fans
He's got one, at least. I thought this was funny anyway...
http://profootballmock.com/troy-aikm...y-romos-fault/
Garrett was next rumored to lose his job since Romo missed the POs the last 3 years in a row, and to think he
turned down the Ravens job. What an ass, especially with all the talent Ozzie gives his coaches.
Romoliscious
This was a SNIPER thread.
Awesome, I'm glad you guys participated. I think Romo has screwed up in the past but at the same time, as good as Flacco is, I don't know how good is he yet. Hopefully, he'll show us in the playoffs this year.
Romo gets killed. There were years where his line couldn't protect the guy. He really is talented. I love Flacco, but I don't think it would be completely different if Romo were in his shoes. I hope I'm wrong this year. That's all I'm saying.
It is. I was told romo isn't as good as flacco bc ge doesn't win much in the playoffs.
Which brings me to my next pt, how many SB has Joe won? The same as Romo. I'm not even being negative about Joe, but comparing to another QB who I think is good..... AND STILL PEOPLE GET PISSED AND THEIR PANTIES IN BUNCH.
I see no benefit to posting an opinion on this board...if your not a regular you get your ass-chewed.
You are twisting my words. I gave my argument why I thought Romo was a good qb, similar to Flacco, and you respond with how many playoff games has Romo won. How is that a compelling rebuttal when neither qb has a SB? Which is why I mentioned Mark Sanchez.
Marino set numerous passing records, which Joe hasn't so I don't understand how he got dragged into this topic.
Playoff wins are a great counter if you're a champion ala Eli. If not then they are just additional wins.
FWIW, and IMHO, I gotta laugh....again!
This is the same kind of lame "Who's number 1 in Power Rankings" nonsense. Just a point of order - what in the wide world of sports does "better" mean? I read the entire set of posts in this thread, and not until page 4 do I see "I was told romo isn't as good as flacco bc ge doesn't win much in the playoffs."
If that is the criteria for "better", then why did you start this thread? IF Flacco wins more in the playoffs than Romo, AND, IF "better" is defined as "win more than the other guy in the playoffs", then, your honor, I rest my case -- Flacco is "better".
Sorry, I don't mean to piss on anyone's parade, but I really do look askance at threads and debates where the question is, "Who is better?" or some similar type of query. You ask a subjectively oriented question, and cannot receive an objective answer without setting some criteria as to how to debate who is better, and then complain.
In the immortal words of "the best" linebacker to play football, "Child...PLEASE!"
p.s. to Lemming- I agree with Ravenous! The Romo-Sanchez quote is funny, but your post/image made me laugh out loud!