Originally Posted by
Haloti92
Sentence #1: And #10 was relatively innocuous. Yet, you posted 15-20 escalating posts after that. I didn't respond to post #10. In fact I barely responded at all until you started with QB rating excuses and aDOT stuff.
Sentence #2: It was simple and not too bad. The motivation was transparent obviously, but also not very surprising. It was the next several posts where you started implying equivalence and veering towards "what else can we expect, look around" defensiveness.
Sentence #3: You mean your panties are bunched because someone implied Flacco might be somewhat responsible for his results. And maybe even that those results are worse than they should be. Get looser panties is my suggestion. As it is, you are Exhibit A of Tony's point, even if you are oblivious to that fact.
Sentence #4: Hilarious irony. Another personal shot from the guy with his panties up his crack.
Sentence #5. Relevance to the current discussion? Between the two of us I am the only one making points.
Sentence #6: More beautiful irony, as for going-on a half dozen posts you haven't done anything but repeat addressed arguments, move goalposts, employ fallacies, and make personal shots. And also claim you were leaving only to re-appear for more personal shots and non-arguments.
Sentence #7: Yeah, look at "how much respect" I lost tonight. Did you really just post that? :grbac: You can't help yourself can you? You've been hitting the sauce?
Sentence #8: Cantankerous is a two-way street, unfortunately. And there is no contest who is the bigger blow hard, you have me crushed. I actually make supported arguments. You just flail and resort to immature personal shots, over and over and over. Including Sentence #8.