I've never been accused of being particularly bright, so I'm sure I'm missing something, and maybe one of the "Gaither-apologists" can point out the defeciency in my logic. But, the way I see it, to defend Gaither you either have to admit he was "faking", "milking" his injury, which to my mind is indefensible; or admit that he was legimately injured, and the whole argument is moot anyway, because Oher would have been at LT in his spot anyway, and he surely would have ...