Results 13 to 17 of 17
-
11-04-2007, 10:14 AM #13
Re: "Dream" offense that won't happen (but good for discussion)
It really is weird how a professional team can be so good on defense, yet stink so much on offense. When you think about it, it doesn't makes sense that there is so little "bonded talent" on the O. It ain't just the players for sure....
-
11-04-2007, 10:16 AM #14Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Houston, TX Y'all
- Posts
- 34,414
Re: "Dream" offense that won't happen (but good for discussion)
-
Re: "Dream" offense that won't happen (but good for discussion)
The ? is the QB! I'm not starting QB controversy here, but neither one of our starters will get it done until Billick lets the playmakers play! If I could somehow give McNair Boller's body, I would have no complaints! We under utilize McGahee and place too much on the shoulders of McNair/Boller.
I wouldn't mind the dink-and-dunk offense, but not keeping the opposing "D" spread out in the Red Zone hurts us. keep 'em spread and hand it off to McGahee or play action to Heap!!! Give it to the playmakers!!!!!!
-
11-04-2007, 06:57 PM #16Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 1,165
Re: "Dream" offense that won't happen (but good for discussion)
The QB is a question...but it's still not the biggest one.
The biggest question is why the staff can't seem to put a gameplan together that works. No one really cares what it is, so long as it works.
Sure the team could run more, they should also be trying to spread teams out. Pittsburgh and NE have problems with their linebackers get forced to play in a lot of space. I'm sure Billick knows this, but can he plan the game right and get the offense in good shape to execute? The fact that question is seriously asked and debated is the problem with this team right there.
-
11-04-2007, 10:10 PM #17
Re: "Dream" offense that won't happen (but good for discussion)
Exiled Raven..... Good Point. What is it going to take???
Bookmarks