I don't care what anyone says, Lee Evans' catch should have been a catch/TD!

[Golden Era at The U]

He caught it, had full possession, and took two full steps before it was knocked out.

Ravens got robbed!

I don't care if he was balancing it delicately on the tips of his fingers or had it stuffed so far into his gut that you couldn't tell the difference between it and his spleen, it should have been ruled a TD.

He met all the criteria the same way that someone jumping over the pile has the ball's tip touch the goal line before losing control of it.

It's no surprise that the Pats loving/favoring NFL world didn't look at it or question it though.

[Justlovemybirds]

He caught it, had full possession, and took two full steps before it was knocked out.

Ravens got robbed!

I don't care if he was balancing it delicately on the tips of his fingers or had it stuffed so far into his gut that you couldn't tell the difference between it and his spleen, it should have been ruled a TD.

He met all the criteria the same way that someone jumping over the pile has the ball's tip touch the goal line before losing control of it.

It's no surprise that the Pats loving/favoring NFL world didn't look at it or question it though.

:word It reminded of Todd Heaps TD catch last year in ATL where he caught it took two steps and the ball was immediately knocked out, it was called a TD just like that one should have been.

[dscola31]

I agree and the fact that they didn't even review it is criminal.

[BleedPurple92]

Wont even lie, i thought they should have reviewed that.

That looked good from my end. Should have been reviewed, atleast.

[lowrider]

I thought it was a catch as well. What pisses me off is that they didn't even review it. None the less, Evans has to protect that ball. He had a defender draped all over him. He cannot let that happen in that situation.

[Raveninwoodlawn]

What were you watching? That was clearly not a TD.

[pslholder96]

Oh boy here we go again. The first of many conspiracy threads. Sorry but the ruling on the field was correct. The receiver has to maintain possession during the entire act of making the catch and crossing the goal line. The rules for a runner are much different.

[Golden Era at The U]

:word It reminded of Todd Heaps TD catch last year in ATL where he caught it took two steps and the ball was immediately knocked out, it was called a TD just like that one should have been.

Let me know if you can find a video of that one...

[MD Boy]

Don't know why I'm putting myself through this....but watching the last drive again.

[pslholder96]

Wont even lie, i thought they should have reviewed that.

That looked good from my end. Should have been reviewed, atleast.

That play is not reviewable. Even Harbaugh acknowledge this in his press conference.

[Golden Era at The U]

What were you watching? That was clearly not a TD.

Which criteria of a catch did he not meet?

He had possession, as loosely as it may have been, he had possession.

He took two full steps AFTER making the catch.

So tell me/us, which criteria did he not meet in making a catch? No one cares about your opinion, facts!

[Golden Era at The U]

That play is not reviewable. Even Harbaugh acknowledge this in his press conference.

It's reviewable if the Refs want to review it, isn't it?