Results 25 to 36 of 87
-
Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?
Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.
-
Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?
Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.
-
-
08-12-2013, 05:33 PM #28
Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?
TL's inspiration must have come from reading the board.
The way many Ravens fans are whining about the departure of Anquan Boldin is like a bunch of scorned women at a wedding shower bellyaching about men.Get over it!Anquan Boldin is gone!He’s not coming back!Oh and by the way, it was THE RIGHT THING TO DO!
That pretty much sums it up.
-
Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?
I am basing it off of what Boldin did under Cameron. That's what we're really used to. It won't be hard for Stokely to match that, or even do better than that. The Ravens have a better offensive line and coordinator. That production can be duplicated and surpassed.
"Please take with you this final sword, The Excellector. I am praying that your journey will be guided by the light", Leon Shore
-
08-12-2013, 05:42 PM #30
-
08-12-2013, 05:42 PM #31Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 1,829
-
Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?
So what should we expect from Joe since what we're used to is what he did under Cameron?
Only Joe, Pitta, and Torrey should be expected to benefit from Caldwell?
That better coordinator turned Boldin back IMO a star just 6-7 months ago.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HDAlthough Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.
-
Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?
The proof will be in the pudding, I agree with that.
I'll say this also...look at the original post on this thread. It wasn't started by one of the dissenters...and the other threads weren't either. The original posts in these threads invites this discussion.
I
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HDLast edited by Raveninwoodlawn; 08-12-2013 at 06:05 PM.
Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.
-
Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?
Not really. The first paragraph in that post was the epitome of twisting words completely around.
Who has expressed or implied that the team is going to stink, or that we aren't going to win games? Who has even said that Ozzie's moves were dumb or even that they didn't make sense.
What I, and others have said, is that in our opinion, other moves may have just made more sense to us.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HDAlthough Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.
-
08-12-2013, 06:01 PM #35Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Houston, TX Y'all
- Posts
- 34,414
-
08-12-2013, 06:03 PM #36Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 1,829
Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?
Bookmarks