Results 61 to 72 of 83
-
-
Re: Face it. We should have kept Tyrod!
The FO are to blame for this mess. We could have signed Joe to a great deal before the 2012 season but failed. We would have been able to cut ties with him by now asweĺl.
-
-
10-01-2017, 09:04 AM #64Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- New York City
- Posts
- 37,670
- Blog Entries
- 4
Re: Face it. We should have kept Tyrod!
I'm not really 100% sure of what I am posting here, but...
(a) Didn't Joe turn down Ozzie's offer before the 2012 season? Didn't he "gamble" on himself?"
(b) I still don't think the Ravens would have "cut ties" to him either. Even an under-performing Flacco would have been better than the alternative... Bc
-
Re: Face it. We should have kept Tyrod!
-
10-01-2017, 09:18 AM #66Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Posts
- 3,701
-
10-01-2017, 09:27 AM #67
Re: Face it. We should have kept Tyrod!
I will say Joe wouldnt have made that run without Q and his huge catch radius as joe would chuck the ball in Q's direction not very accurate and pray he catch it. With that run joe showed he was worth money but to me not enough to hamstring the team
Sent from my SM-T350 using TapatalkLast edited by iceman43; 10-01-2017 at 09:36 AM.
-
10-01-2017, 09:33 AM #68
-
10-01-2017, 11:45 AM #69
Re: Face it. We should have kept Tyrod!
If you think the ravens offensive line is better than the bills.... then you haven't watched any bills games.
Tyrod may statistically be better this year, but to pretend we should have signed him is like saying we should have drafted Tom Brady
Sent from my ASUS_Z00TD using TapatalkBurn it down
-
10-01-2017, 11:51 AM #70Legendary Asswipe
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- Owings Mills, MD
- Posts
- 16,260
Re: Face it. We should have kept Tyrod!
Tyrod is much better than Flacco
-
10-01-2017, 11:52 AM #71Legendary Asswipe
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- Owings Mills, MD
- Posts
- 16,260
-
10-01-2017, 01:01 PM #72
Bookmarks