Results 13 to 24 of 32
Thread: That "elderly" Ravens defense
-
-
01-11-2012, 10:38 AM #14Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Posts
- 593
Re: That "elderly" Ravens defense
Our defense is definitely better than the Texans. Texans do not scare me on defense one little bit. Outside of the pass rush what do they have? Jonathan joseph who can only cover 1 person? Who are their safeties? Their secondary is not very good, I dont care about statistics, we torched them last time and we'll do it again.
-
-
01-11-2012, 10:39 AM #16
Re: That "elderly" Ravens defense
It was Hou announcer A Ware. I would hardly call him a reporter. Didn't he get like a 7 on the wonderlic?
-
01-11-2012, 11:13 AM #17
Re: That "elderly" Ravens defense
Houston's defense (at least the starters) is much younger than the Ravens.
The Ravens do not have a starter younger than 26 (Webb and McClain), and they have four that are 30 or older (Lewis, Reed, Johnson and Redding).
Houston by comparison has five starters 25 or younger (Reed, Watt, Barwin, Quin and Cushing) and only one starter that is 30 and none older.
When you factor in some of the role players (Jimmy Smith, McPhee, etc.), I am sure the average age of the Ravens defense comes down, some.
Whether this age difference is going to be a factor either way (youth vs. experience) is debatable. But to claim that the Ravens have a "young" defense - as compared to Houston's - just isn't supported by the facts.
-
Re: That "elderly" Ravens defense
Yea, when you compare them to Houston's defense there is certainly an age differential.
This "elderly defense/old defense" statement has been going on for two seasons, when it's really not that true at all. The Ravens have a nice mix of youth and experience, but there are a lot of young guys on the D. Pollard, Ngata, Suggs, Kruger, McPhee, Cody, Jones, Jimmy, Cary, Webb, McClain, and Ellerbe are all still pretty young.
Now, not all of them start, but to dismiss their contribution is incorrect IMO.Disclaimer: The content posted is of my own opinion.
-
01-11-2012, 11:28 AM #19
Re: That "elderly" Ravens defense
Personally, I am not dismissing the contributions of the younger, non-starters, but you have to agree that starters are going to contribute more than non-starters.
And like I said, whether youth is better served than experience is debatable. Would you rather have the 23 year-old Suggs or the 29 year-old Suggs? I will take the latter.
-
01-11-2012, 11:52 AM #20On The Practice Squad
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 49
-
01-11-2012, 11:56 AM #21
-
01-11-2012, 12:01 PM #22
Re: That "elderly" Ravens defense
Mike (the fat one that does commercials about losing weight) has held onto the narrative (for that last 3 years) that the Ravens defense is "long in the tooth". He won't come off that line until Ray and/or Ed retire or play for another team.
After 5 years of early exits, the journey is finally complete.
-
Re: That "elderly" Ravens defense
Well, either he exaggerated or the media blew it out of proportion, or Phil Simms underplayed it significantly because prior to the game Simms said he was at the offensive practice that week and he saw Quinn take about 5 snaps with the 1st team offense.
Kind of interesting how so many different stories kind of conflict.Disclaimer: The content posted is of my own opinion.
-
01-11-2012, 12:10 PM #24Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 185
Re: That "elderly" Ravens defense
i read somewhere that the 2000 team was ,by avg age,the oldest in the nfl that year...i know its nature to assume it wasnt,w a younger ray,cmac,etc...and the team speed was incredible,but look it up.
there is a lot to be said for wisdom
Bookmarks