Results 25 to 36 of 42
-
11-10-2012, 01:05 PM #25Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 3,161
Re: Raiders vs Ravens Prediction Thread
Palmer will make this D pay for things that Weeden was unable to exploit last week. Lots of open receivers were missed that won't be this time. I still don't think it'll be enough though. Should be a high scoring affair if Flacco doesn't get crushed by Seymour and his boys.
Ravens 31
Raiders 27
-
11-10-2012, 01:16 PM #26Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 2,252
Re: Raiders vs Ravens Prediction Thread
-
11-10-2012, 01:17 PM #27Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 2,252
-
Re: Raiders vs Ravens Prediction Thread
Ravens 27-24
-
-
11-10-2012, 03:06 PM #30Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 3,161
Re: Raiders vs Ravens Prediction Thread
Really...hmmmm...that could be very good for the good guys.
-
11-10-2012, 08:12 PM #31DeputyDawg Guest
-
Re: Raiders vs Ravens Prediction Thread
Raiders are historically bad at 1 PM on the East Coast. I think they're 0 for their last 7.
It shouldn't be close.. We really need another game like we had opening night where we just steamrolled our opponent.
I'll say we win by 10.
Ravens 27
Raiders 17
-
11-10-2012, 10:26 PM #33
Re: Raiders vs Ravens Prediction Thread
30-23 us
-
11-11-2012, 12:06 PM #34Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Redskins Land (North Virginia)
- Posts
- 146
- Blog Entries
- 1
Re: Raiders vs Ravens Prediction Thread
Raiders - 23
You guys - 31
-
11-11-2012, 12:15 PM #35
Re: Raiders vs Ravens Prediction Thread
Ravens - 30
Raiders - 17
Raiders score a late TD to make it look reasonable. Ravens get at least one defensive TD.
-
11-11-2012, 01:52 PM #36On The Practice Squad
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Posts
- 74
Re: Raiders vs Ravens Prediction Thread
IINM, I believe the Ravens have gone to Oakland twice - 2003, and 2009 (actually 2010, as it was the last game of the '09 reg. season).
Anyway, I was expecting a blowout regardless, but with McFadden and Seymour out...well, that sentiment hasn't changed. 27-13...and frankly it should be an even wider MOV.
Bookmarks