Results 121 to 132 of 325
Thread: Officiating (Merged Threads)
-
09-16-2012, 05:44 PM #121Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Houston, TX Y'all
- Posts
- 34,414
-
09-16-2012, 05:44 PM #122
Re: Officiating (Merged Threads)
The reason the refs called it a fumble in the first place is because it clearly was not and would be overturned. Otherwise, they would have had to call the intentional grounding.
Refs, not as stupid as they pretend to be.
-
09-16-2012, 05:47 PM #123
-
09-16-2012, 05:48 PM #124Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 906
-
Re: Officiating (Merged Threads)
You are so biased against the Ravens it is not even worth listening to anything you say. There was NOTHING dubious about the roughing the passer on Flacco. That would've been called in the year 2000. Over a second after he threw it the defender went after him. Oh, and there was a missed DPI on that play. And Pollard did NOT have unnecessary roughness by any stretch of the imagination. You think just because it was a big hit we got lucky it wasn't called. He didn't hit his helmet, and he didn't lead with his helmet. His shoulder pad went to his chest.
-
09-16-2012, 05:48 PM #126
-
09-16-2012, 05:49 PM #127Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 2,252
Re: Officiating (Merged Threads)
Clearly you didn't major in logic. Try taking the two premises in that clause and negating them if you're having trouble.
So originally: Grounding NOT called if Pass lands AT OR BEYOND los.
Therefore: Grounding WILL be Called if a Pass lands NOT AT OR BEYOND the los.
-
09-16-2012, 05:49 PM #128Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Houston, TX Y'all
- Posts
- 34,414
-
09-16-2012, 05:51 PM #129
-
Re: Officiating (Merged Threads)
It says right there in text, clear as crystal, that it is still intentional grounding if the ball doesn't make it to the line of scrimmage. The ball did NOT make it to the line of scrimmage. Therefore, it was the wrong call. What is so hard to comprehend about this?
-
-
Bookmarks