Quote Originally Posted by JAB1985 View Post
Ok i missed those last couple posts, which seems to have turned this entire thread 180. Im completely confused now.

Nflnetwork is saying he can upheld to suspensions if he can prove intent to injure which he failed to do originally. Im not sure how hes getting more evidence, its not like hed be holding anything back so to me this is a delay at the least but sounds like unless something substantial comes up they should be reduced?
See Haloti's post above: I think he's speculating (and I'm inclined to agree) that the evidence of "pay to injure" was never as strong as the NFL would have liked, and that's why Goodell included the bounties/"illegal bonuses" as part of his justification for the suspensions. Those will have to be treated separately now.