Ray Rice voted 22nd in top 100.

**leachisabeast** · 06-14-2012, 02:17 AM

http://www.nfl.com/top100/2012?modul...000d5d829cbc78

What other backs will finish higher than him?

**elland** · 06-14-2012, 04:24 AM

Originally Posted by leachisabeast

http://www.nfl.com/top100/2012?modul...000d5d829cbc78

What other backs will finish higher than him?

Peterson and MJD... hmm and McCoy not that he should be ranked higher. I believe they are the only one left...

CJ 100
McGahee 98
Lynch 94
Turnerr 88
Sproles ???? 86
F.Jackson 83
McFadden 60
S. Jackson 37
Forte 33
Gore 28
Foster 25

**JAB1985** · 06-14-2012, 07:28 AM

i lost respect for these rankings awhile ago. Jimmy Graham over Gronk was pretty much the last straw.

**wickedsolo** · 06-14-2012, 07:46 AM

Originally Posted by JAB1985

i lost respect for these rankings awhile ago. Jimmy Graham over Gronk was pretty much the last straw.

Yea, that was dumb.

IMO, Gronk was easily one of the top 15 players last year regardless of position.

**Flipping Birdie** · 06-14-2012, 07:54 AM

Originally Posted by wickedsolo

Yea, that was dumb.

IMO, Gronk was easily one of the top 25 players last year regardless of position.

He's listed as being #21. Am I looking at a different list? http://top100.nfl.com/tracker

**wickedsolo** · 06-14-2012, 07:58 AM

Originally Posted by Flipping Birdie

He's listed as being #21. Am I looking at a different list? http://top100.nfl.com/tracker

Typo.

I meant to hit top 15.

Purely my opinion though.

**wickedsolo** · 06-14-2012, 08:02 AM

Another reason that this list is dumb is they have James Harrison ranked above Eli Manning, Ben Roethlisberger, etc.

Dude missed about 5 or 6 games & had his lowest sack count in 3 years.

Tamba Hali had 12 sacks, played every game, and was ranked lower. Von Miller also had more sacks and more forced fumbles and was still ranked lower.

**Ravens75** · 06-16-2012, 11:26 AM

Originally Posted by JAB1985

i lost respect for these rankings awhile ago. Jimmy Graham over Gronk was pretty much the last straw.

You act like Jimmy Graham is Ed Dickson. Jimmy Graham is elite and unlike Gronk doesn't have another TE that draws considerable attention.

I wouldn't have had a problem if Gronk was 15 and Graham was 20 but some of you guys act like Graham should be 70 and Gronk 10.

**jonboy79** · 06-16-2012, 11:37 AM

Originally Posted by Ravens75

You act like Jimmy Graham is Ed Dickson. Jimmy Graham is elite and unlike Gronk doesn't have another TE that draws considerable attention.

I wouldn't have had a problem if Gronk was 15 and Graham was 20 but some of you guys act like Graham should be 70 and Gronk 10.

Npo, but I would have thought gronk was top 10 or close to it with Graham in the 30s to 40s. I would also say that there should be a CLEAR line between the two with Gronk coming out on top. He had more yards, TD's and is a FAR, FAR better blocker. Having another TE is more of a detractor then addition. Though NO had a better WR corps, and a much more wide open pass game.

**TheJoeFlaccoShow** · 06-16-2012, 12:08 PM

This just shows again how clueless players are when it comes to voting on...anything. Just like the Pro Bowl this is a name recognition/popularity contest....nothing more.

They are so zoned in on their own team, rarely watch other games and are so busy in season they can't possibly be relied on for this type of thing. Just another time filler for NFLN.