Results 25 to 36 of 79
-
Re: Why Obama is winning the swing-states thus winning the electoral votes and thus winning the election.
And there goes the Jewish vote. It drops by 22% in NY which is not a swing state
but with the way OBY is losing all these voters in all the states, who knows, it
could be a swing state by the fall.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...jewish-support
And you can probably add the Polish vote dropping too after he insulted the Polish
death camps during WW2.
Also add the female vote dropping after the attack on stay at home moms.
http://www.politico.com/politico44/2...ts-117411.htmlLast edited by AirFlacco; 06-13-2012 at 04:05 AM.
-
06-13-2012, 01:18 PM #26
Re: Why Obama is winning the swing-states thus winning the electoral votes and thus winning the election.
So, do we now add Wisconsin to the Swing State mix? Romney up by 3.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...nsin_president
Wonder where the thread originator went?
-
-
Re: Why Obama is winning the swing-states thus winning the electoral votes and thus winning the election.
DEMS are in panic with these blown leads and tell OBY he has to change the message. He keeps blaming Bush
but no one is buying it.
As Wisconsin goes, so do the rest of the states.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/20...obama_can_loseLast edited by AirFlacco; 06-14-2012 at 06:58 AM.
-
Re: Why Obama is winning the swing-states thus winning the electoral votes and thus winning the election.
He can go around blaming Bush all he wants. While there is some truth to he inherited a mess, every President, Governor, Mayor etc. inherits something. How much of the mess we have today was inherited can be debated forever with no agreement on what's correct.
What is not debatable is that nothing has gotten better. In 3.5 years there isn't one thing that is better than when he took office.
-
Re: Why Obama is winning the swing-states thus winning the electoral votes and thus winning the election.
Could OBY be losing California's 55 electoral votes too?
That may not be as far fetched as it seems. See link and this is in a lefty wingnut
town. Same non-sightings in Selicon Valley. People are mad. People are out of work.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2896161/posts
-
06-17-2012, 08:57 PM #31
No, Obama will not lose California. They are like Maryland. No matter how bad the state gets, how many people and businesses leave or shut down, they will always dance when Dems say dance, and ask how high when the Dems say jump.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk 2
-
06-18-2012, 12:58 PM #32Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Houston, TX Y'all
- Posts
- 34,414
I read that article too and laughed.
Obama could pull down his drawers and crap on the CA state flag and still win it.
-
Re: Why Obama is winning the swing-states thus winning the electoral votes and thus winning the election.
It's really kind of pathetic in a way that Obama isn't running away with this thing.
Disclaimer: The content posted is of my own opinion.
-
-
Re: Why Obama is winning the swing-states thus winning the electoral votes and thus winning the election.
Haven't you heard?
He's the incumbent. The economy is improving. There's more
jobs. It's Bush's fault. Mitt's a racist.
Incumbents never lose.
Fact is, he really should be winning as the incumbent because they usually win. The only thing keeping him close according to Carville is people are buying that Mitt doesn't connect to the people.
But even Rove said on TV that it's phenominal that Mitt has a +3
point lead in June.Last edited by AirFlacco; 06-18-2012 at 02:25 PM.
-
Re: Why Obama is winning the swing-states thus winning the electoral votes and thus winning the election.
Because of a lot of things. AF said most of it though. Incumbant, minority vote, youth vote, "he got Bin Ladin", gas prices are falling (sort of)...etc etc etc.
Most of all - IMO - Mitt is a really lame choice and the thing just reeks of "the Reps didn't have anyone better".
I'm no Obama supporter by any stretch of the imagination, but Mitt Romney is as equally disturbing IMO. I mean, if we're really getting down to the nitty-gritty the only reason Mitt was even a viable candidate was because of his money. I see Mitt Romney and I see a puppet. I don't see a legitimate candidate who can actually get some shit done.Disclaimer: The content posted is of my own opinion.
Bookmarks