Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 58
  1. #31

    Re: Ravens want Rice, Flacco might have to wait



    A lot of Flacco pundits fail to grasp that the offense that is run in Bmore is completely different as the Pats/Saints/Packers.. even Steelers. It is a WINNING offense... It aint pretty, and probably not what most fans want. Now its very debatable whether it can win a SB (the #1 seed Chargers in 2006/7 lost a tough one with a conservative Cam gameplan), but no one can argue that it doesnt win games. Not even an elite QB in this system will put up numbers. Joe is very good at what the Ravens want their QB to do in their system, so you cannot simply compare QB stats to determine what Joe is worth. Considering that... its an absolute no-brainer to the organization.




  2. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    31,864
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Ravens want Rice, Flacco might have to wait

    Quote Originally Posted by Ngata Nother Suggs View Post
    Precisely. Franchise Grubbs instead.
    I think that's the plan.
    Milk is for babies. When you grow up, you have to drink beer.

    -Arnold Schwarzenegger



    Check out Fatherhood Rules - a blog site dedicated to sports, food, music, movies, and politics.
    http://fatherhoodrules.com




  3. #33

    Re: Ravens want Rice, Flacco might have to wait

    Quote Originally Posted by GOTA View Post
    They could always get Flacco done during the season. Other teams do that, sometimes even with big contracts. That's what the Bills did with Fitzpatrick.
    I hope it doesn't come to that. Both sides have equal leverage over the summer. Once the season starts - and Joe has to be subjected to the possibility of injury before his big payday - then a lot of players (and AGENTS!) figure why not roll the dice and hit free agency?

    The franchise number is just too big to mess around with like that, IMO.

    Plus, with Fitzpatrick - whose contract looks like a pretty big mistake right now - there was an unknown quantity to him, where he sort of came out of nowhere to play so well (and the Bills may have been foolish to buy). With Flacco, this moment has been coming for 3 years now. It's time.
    “Talk's cheap - let’s go play.” - #19, Johnny Unitas

    Follow me on Twitter @ravenssalarycap




  4. #34

    Re: Ravens want Rice, Flacco might have to wait

    Quote Originally Posted by wickedsolo View Post
    I think that's the plan.
    It certainly should be (not that we needed Vinny to tell us that! ).
    “Talk's cheap - let’s go play.” - #19, Johnny Unitas

    Follow me on Twitter @ravenssalarycap




  5. #35

    Re: Ravens want Rice, Flacco might have to wait

    Quote Originally Posted by B-more Ravor View Post
    I hope it doesn't come to that. Both sides have equal leverage over the summer. Once the season starts - and Joe has to be subjected to the possibility of injury before his big payday - then a lot of players (and AGENTS!) figure why not roll the dice and hit free agency?

    The franchise number is just too big to mess around with like that, IMO.

    Plus, with Fitzpatrick - whose contract looks like a pretty big mistake right now - there was an unknown quantity to him, where he sort of came out of nowhere to play so well (and the Bills may have been foolish to buy). With Flacco, this moment has been coming for 3 years now. It's time.
    Let me ask you a question. First of all this is all based on if Flacco has another ho-hum Flacco outing in the AFC Championship. It's very likely. If he rolls up a ton of offense on the Patriots it could all change. I think this game is that important for Flacco.

    Suppose the Ravens going into 2012 have Ray Rice locked up for what should be at least three years at the level he's at now. Basically one of the best.

    The question I think that people honestly need to ask themselves is how many more games do you think they could win with one or the other. Rice is an NFL superstar. Flacco is not. A decent veteran free agent QB could play at Flacco's current level if he doesn't like playing out his rookie deal deciding he'll become a FA. The Ravens could survive. There aren't a lot players like Ray Rice. There are a lot of quarterbacks like Flacco.




  6. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Mt. Arrogance in the middle of the .11 rolling acres of The Windbag Estates
    Posts
    4,492

    Re: Ravens want Rice, Flacco might have to wait

    Quote Originally Posted by BcRaven View Post
    Greg, by 2013 both Ray and Reed may retire, and that would free up a lot of cap room... Bc
    Doesn't matter, the first year or two of Flacco's deal with be the lower cap hits.




  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,547
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Ravens want Rice, Flacco might have to wait

    Quote Originally Posted by Ngata Nother Suggs View Post
    Let me ask you a question. First of all this is all based on if Flacco has another ho-hum Flacco outing in the AFC Championship. It's very likely. If he rolls up a ton of offense on the Patriots it could all change. I think this game is that important for Flacco.

    Suppose the Ravens going into 2012 have Ray Rice locked up for what should be at least three years at the level he's at now. Basically one of the best.

    The question I think that people honestly need to ask themselves is how many more games do you think they could win with one or the other. Rice is an NFL superstar. Flacco is not. A decent veteran free agent QB could play at Flacco's current level if he doesn't like playing out his rookie deal deciding he'll become a FA. The Ravens could survive. There aren't a lot players like Ray Rice. There are a lot of quarterbacks like Flacco.
    First off, what makes you think they won't do both contracts this offseason?

    Second, you're supposition about which player is more important is just wrong. RB's are much easier to replace than QB's. Yes, Rice is special, but it's much easier to replace him than it would be to start over at QB. And who exactly are these veteran QB's that would plug in and play better than Flacco?




  8. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    31,864
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Ravens want Rice, Flacco might have to wait

    Quote Originally Posted by Ngata Nother Suggs View Post
    Let me ask you a question. First of all this is all based on if Flacco has another ho-hum Flacco outing in the AFC Championship. It's very likely. If he rolls up a ton of offense on the Patriots it could all change. I think this game is that important for Flacco.

    Suppose the Ravens going into 2012 have Ray Rice locked up for what should be at least three years at the level he's at now. Basically one of the best.

    The question I think that people honestly need to ask themselves is how many more games do you think they could win with one or the other. Rice is an NFL superstar. Flacco is not. A decent veteran free agent QB could play at Flacco's current level if he doesn't like playing out his rookie deal deciding he'll become a FA. The Ravens could survive. There aren't a lot players like Ray Rice. There are a lot of quarterbacks like Flacco.
    Just curious, but what FA quarterback do you think would likely be available and be better than Flacco?

    Sure, you could say Manning, but he's still under contract and may stay that way. There is no way that the Saints let Brees walk, so who would be better than?

    There really aren't too many options right now.

    Honestly, I disagree with the entire premise as well. The Texans' D shut down Ray Rice and the OL for much of the game. If it weren't for Flacco, the Ravens may not have been able to score a TD at all.

    It doesn't matter anyway. They're convinced that they can win with him. He doesn't ever need to be a Tom Brady or an Aaron Rodgers, but he does need a better supporting cast (i.e. receivers who don't drop a handful of passes per game) and he needs a better offensive strategist. Let's see what he does without Cam Cameron. My guess is that it would be infinitely better.

    I do agree that this Patriots game is important for Flacco though, but I don't think he'll put up monster numbers. I think that he may throw the ball 18-25 times and the offense will feature Ray Rice and Ricky Williams.
    Milk is for babies. When you grow up, you have to drink beer.

    -Arnold Schwarzenegger



    Check out Fatherhood Rules - a blog site dedicated to sports, food, music, movies, and politics.
    http://fatherhoodrules.com




  9. #39
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Ellicott City
    Posts
    306

    Re: Ravens want Rice, Flacco might have to wait

    Quote Originally Posted by Ngata Nother Suggs View Post
    The question I think that people honestly need to ask themselves is how many more games do you think they could win with one or the other. Rice is an NFL superstar. Flacco is not. A decent veteran free agent QB could play at Flacco's current level if he doesn't like playing out his rookie deal deciding he'll become a FA. The Ravens could survive. There aren't a lot players like Ray Rice. There are a lot of quarterbacks like Flacco.
    I'm sorry, but there are NOT a lot of QB's like Flacco- He's not a superstar, but he's about 10-13 range. And WHO are you going to get? Seriously, who? All Flacco has done is win for 4 straight years. We had great running teams and strong defenses in the past- did that get us to the playoffs EVERY year? NO!

    WTF. Good quarterbacks don't just fall off of trees. How do logical people not see this (probably answering my own question). the only way we get rid of Flacco is if we can get a top 2 quarterback in the draft- and for that, we'd have to TRADE OUR ENTIRE DRAFT. and how often does that work out? Plus you never know what you're going to get- the "manning" or the "leaf". It's ALWAYS a crap shoot- and when you have a team that goes to the playoffs EVERY freakin year with a QB, you just don't do that. the stupidity just makes me scratch my head.

    Who??




  10. #40

    Re: Ravens want Rice, Flacco might have to wait

    Quote Originally Posted by edgecrusher View Post
    Joe is not the most important player on the offense so he needs to get in line. He is a game manager who can throw the occasional laser to a speedy WR or dump some balls off to Rice. He is good enough to keep long term, I think. I do think the Ravens management should keep an eye on the draft for a good QB who drops down into the later rounds...
    They did that already and he's currently sitting on our 53 man roster.




  11. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wilton, CT
    Posts
    16,039
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: Ravens want Rice, Flacco might have to wait

    What I really wonder is how much Matt Flynn will get. I already agree with the upper numbers that have been posted for Flacco.
    He Who Dares.....Wins




  12. #42

    Re: Ravens want Rice, Flacco might have to wait

    I have no idea who could possibly be available after 2012 if Flacco decides to become a free agent. I'm not saying that is even what I want to happen, but if it did happen finding a replacement for Flacco's current production wouldn't be as hard as finding someone to replace Ray Rice's current production. Matt Hasselbeck could have come here this season and probably been better than Flacco was. Stop misinterpreting my posts as anti-Flacco. For the future of the Ravens I think it would be better to not negotiate a new contract with Flacco until his rookie contract expires. If Flacco can't wait a year are the Ravens supposed to just let him hold their feet to the fire? He's not good enough to carry weight to throw around.




  13. #43

    Re: Ravens want Rice, Flacco might have to wait

    Quote Originally Posted by 52decleetzu View Post
    This phrase is so laughable and off base it invalidates the entire article, at least the part he wrote...


    Flacco, his agent, and Ravens front office people who could remain anonymous would laugh at a $60 million number as his "ceiling". The Ravens would never offer such an insulting contract for a QB who has accomplished so much in his first 4 years. Ever. His agent would laugh them out of the building and ask them if they were joking.

    But again, it just shows how clueless the national media is and how they perceive Flacco's value. It is just mind blowing.
    You can't be serious? Put Rex Grossman on this team, it'll still go to playoff every year.




  14. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX Y'all
    Posts
    27,509
    Quote Originally Posted by ravensinva View Post
    You can't be serious? Put Rex Grossman on this team, it'll still go to playoff every year.
    Thanks, I needed a good laugh.

    Now I have to clean up the coffee I just spit out.
    WARNING: This post may contain material offensive to those who lack wit, humor, common sense and/or supporting factual or anecdotal evidence. All statements and assertions contained herein may be subject to literary devices not limited to: irony, metaphor, allusion and dripping sarcasm.




  15. #45
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Ellicott City
    Posts
    306

    Re: Ravens want Rice, Flacco might have to wait

    Quote Originally Posted by Ngata Nother Suggs View Post
    I'm not saying that is even what I want to happen, but if it did happen finding a replacement for Flacco's current production wouldn't be as hard as finding someone to replace Ray Rice's current production. Matt Hasselbeck could have come here this season and probably been better than Flacco was. Stop misinterpreting my posts as anti-Flacco. For the future of the Ravens I think it would be better to not negotiate a new contract with Flacco until his rookie contract expires. If Flacco can't wait a year are the Ravens supposed to just let him hold their feet to the fire? He's not good enough to carry weight to throw around.
    I just don't see how you can say this. The QB *is* the hardest position on a team to replace- Easily. It's what every team is searching for (unitl they have a franchise QB). While in fact running back is one of the easiest positions to replace- obviously not to the caliber of Ray Rice, but you'd be just fine with a moderate dropoff in RB. do you not think we'd still be in the playoffs if Willis Mcghahee was running instead of Rice? And maybe Cam would take the training wheels off of our simple, dump-off oriented offense if we didn't have Ray Rice. But if you don't know that the QB is the hardest position to fill on an NFL roster, you haven't been watching very long.

    I don't know if I can even count on two freakin hands how many quarterbacks we went through after Vinny (Zeier, Redman, Banks, Case, Grbac, Wright, Boller- and throw in the magnificent Troy Smith if you want since everyone who bitches about Flacco wanted him to be the QB- where's he now) . And how many playoff wins did we accomplish all those years with all of those (easily replacable quarterbacks)? Only McNair worked- and that was for 1 season- why? b/c he was OLD. same thing with Hasselbeck- he may give you a couple of good years, but he will start to fall off soon- why give up on a 4th year QB who's above average, and gets to the playoffs every year??

    How is this not clearly obvious- you need a good quarterbacks to get to the playoffs every year- he touches the ball on every snap- and if he has a bad game, you usually lose.




Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russell Street Report Website Design by D3Corp Ocean City Maryland