Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Punt...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bel Air
    Posts
    203

    Punt...

    When the balls was downed on the 3 yard line, a Seattle player grabbed at it. He touched the ball and then Ayanbandejo recovered it. How come the refs waived it off? Why does this not create a turn over?





  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Rochester, Minnesota (from Towson)
    Posts
    1,464

    Re: Punt...

    Quote Originally Posted by ace2die View Post
    When the balls was downed on the 3 yard line, a Seattle player grabbed at it. He touched the ball and then Ayanbandejo recovered it. How come the refs waived it off? Why does this not create a turn over?
    Once a Raven bats a ball... the return team can touch it, try to pick it up, run it, fumble it... whatever. Those are the rules. That is why Ed Reed is always sticking his hands in there when he returns punts. Makes your rate go up a bit though doesn't it. lol





  3. #3

    Re: Punt...

    Once the kicking team touches the ball at all, then the absolute worse outcome for the receiving team is that they take the ball at that spot (where the kicking team first touches it). This is why you see Ed Reed pointlessly but amusingly dive into a circle of kick covering players and make futile attempt to touch it or pick it up, because on these plays the kicking team had touched it, Ed knows this, and Ed is nuts.

    Edit: Damn, I type too slow, Fury beat me to it, lol. What he said.





  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Albuquerque
    Posts
    14,042

    Re: Punt...

    Haloti and Fury are right. But its kind of a dumb rule when you about it.
    Master of 'Gifs for dummies'

    "The world called for wetwork, and we answered. No greater good. No just cause." - Kazuhira Miller





  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Rochester, Minnesota (from Towson)
    Posts
    1,464

    Re: Punt...

    Quote Originally Posted by Dade View Post
    Haloti and Fury are right. But its kind of a dumb rule when you about it.
    Well, I think THIS is the reason it's in place. I haven't read the rule book, so this is just my presumption....

    It's probably in the books so Players on the punt team covering kicks (i.e the Ravens in this scenario) don't bat the ball back into a receiving team's (Seahawks) back's when they are facing away, or can't react to the otherwise "live" ball.

    Everything else that takes place after that... is just players reacting to a "loop hole" in the rule.. maybe?





  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    San Dimas, CA
    Posts
    17,334

    Re: Punt...

    I once saw a Detroit Lions player shoot into the circle of defensive players waiting to down the ball after touching it, scooping it up cleanly and returning it for a touchdown, so there is some precedent to the crazy actions of Ed Reed.





  7. #7

    Re: Punt...

    The rule makes sense to me. But in Ed Reed's case, what if the Refs didn't see the punting team touch the ball? It just seems like a huge risk to me.





Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Link To Mobile Site
var infolinks_pid = 3297965; var infolinks_wsid = 0; //—->