Results 37 to 48 of 64
Thread: The Ray Rice taunting penalty...
-
10-31-2011, 02:15 PM #37
Re: The Ray Rice taunting penalty...
I called it from the upper deck before the flag was thrown. I watched it on DVR this morning and saw the same thing. You hit the nail right here: "Very suggestive, taking advantage of an opponent in a vulnerable position" . To me this is the essence of taunting and nothing remotely similar to what Rice did.
-
10-31-2011, 02:27 PM #38Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Clarksburg, MD
- Posts
- 6,055
Re: The Ray Rice taunting penalty...
Hmmm thanks for the clarification, as for the non-call of the glancing blow to Flacco's head? Two comments:
1. Didn't seem very glancing to me.
2. Brady would have probably gotten the flag. ;)
-
Re: The Ray Rice taunting penalty...
I'm sticking with my point of view that you can celebrate with a yell and a dance, but if you do it in the face of an opponent, as Rice did to Carter, and as Carter did to Rice, that's taunting. Maybe not the way we'd like to see taunting called, but that's the deal. Should have been offsetting. By the way, the rulebook is pretty comical in describing it...
The use of abusive, threatening, or insulting language or gestures to opponents, teammates, officials, or representatives of the League Violations will be penalized if any of the acts are committed directly at an opponent. These acts include but are not limited to: sack dances; home run swing; incredible hulk; spiking the ball; spinning the ball; throwing or shoving the ball; pointing; pointing the ball; verbal taunting; military salute; standing over an opponent (prolonged and with provocation); or dancing.
The use of baiting or taunting acts or words that engender ill will between teams. Violations will be penalized if any of the acts occur anywhere on the field. These acts include but are not limited to: throat slash; machine-gun salute; sexually-suggestive gestures, prolonged gyrations; or stomping on a team logo.
-
-
Re: The Ray Rice taunting penalty...
Agree. He was basically mocking the lame Cardinals player who thought it would be cool to celebrate making a tackle after a 7 yard gain. Don't know if that was his first ever NFL tackle, but that was pretty comical to begin with. If what Rice did was deemed as taunting then why isn't the Cardinals player also flagged? What he did was essentially stand over top of Rice and scream and flex his arms.
-
10-31-2011, 02:35 PM #42
-
10-31-2011, 02:40 PM #43
-
Re: The Ray Rice taunting penalty...
Triplette's crew is notorious for calling ticky-tack fouls. And there were plenty of them yesterday. I thought Rice did in fact scream towards that guy's face.. and after Pollard had already been called for it, Rice should have known better..
But the flag that really irked me was on Reed's INT, Lardarius got called for holding down field and all the replays clearly showed he did nothing of the sort, in fact, the WR was grabbing his shirt most of the way down the field.
The way I look at it, we got two horrible officiating crews in back to back weeks. Hopefully we don't end up with a scab crew for the big game in Pittsburgh. Here's hoping it's Ed "Guns" Hoculi and his guys. They call the most fair game in the league that I can recall.
-
Re: The Ray Rice taunting penalty...
Oh, and watching our game yesterday with all the ticky tack BS and flags, then watching Steelers-Pats maul each other all day with very little laundry? WTF was that? You'd think the league would try to make things a little more even when it comes to officiating. Mike Carey and his boys swallowed the whistle on plays where Triplette's entire crew would have been heaving the hankies.
-
Re: The Ray Rice taunting penalty...
I know I'm in the minority, but I thought they were calling a good game -- including all the defensive holding and the one offensive PI call on Arizona -- until about three minutes into the fourth quarter when they flagged Webb foir interference then came back four minutes later with the Rice taunting call .
Those were really bad. When they were called, with the game on the line, made it seem worse.
I also thought it was ticky tacky to flag McKinnie for lining up in the backfield twice. I've seen far worse from OT's.
What did everyone think of the roughing the passer call that they nailed Campbell for when he tossed Joe to the turf? I thought that was close to being legal, because he was there as the ball was released. Didn't seem all that obviously late to me.
They were so focused on that, the line judge missed a penalty on the Ravens when LaQuan Williams was split out wide right on the line of scrimmage, covering Pitta, who was also on the line four yards outside Oher.
But overall, I thought the Jags crew was far worse, with the late flags they sheepishly dumped onto the field well after the play.Last edited by Shas; 10-31-2011 at 02:58 PM.
-
10-31-2011, 02:56 PM #47Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 2,988
Re: The Ray Rice taunting penalty...
The good news is, they won't be calling a single taunting penalty next week. Those kinds of displays are what the NFL loves about Ravens/Steelers.
-
10-31-2011, 02:58 PM #48Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 2,988
Re: The Ray Rice taunting penalty...
The first taunting penalty on Pollard was bogus too. Unless someone pulls a TO, and runs down to the fifty yard line and uses the balls as a prop to specifically show up the opposing team as a whole, I don't see the point in calling taunting when you allow the players to celebrate after every positive play. Sometimes its a celebration, others its taunting? Bogus, pure and simple.
Bookmarks