Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 34

Thread: Lardarius Webb

  1. #1

    Lardarius Webb



    I'm coming around to the safety thing...maybe a hybrid safety/corner.

    IMHO, he just isn't a corner. He's a good football player though and should be on the field in some shape form or fashion. Unfortunately, it just looks like he may be a tweener.

    Maybe have him put on another 10 lbs or so and try him at safety next year? Maybe be a nickle/dime safety?

    Even last week, we all thought he had a good game with the 11 tackles, but corners making that many tackles means that they are completing a lot of passes on you.

    I wasn't big on the safety thing before due to his size, but I mean it's apparent to me that he is a good football player, just not that good of a corner...so we may have to find other ways to use him.




  2. #2

    Re: Ladarious Webb

    Well the truth is Jimmy Smith and Chris Carr are our two best cover guys (we hope with Smith, obviously). They're also injured.




  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Mt. Arrogance in the middle of the .11 rolling acres of The Windbag Estates
    Posts
    4,450

    Re: Ladarious Webb

    I like him fine as a DB, he should not be returning punts. He makes very poor decisions back there.




  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wilton, CT
    Posts
    13,648
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: Ladarious Webb

    Webb is a much better CB than Foxworth.
    He Who Dares.....Wins




  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    over by the dental floss bush
    Posts
    15,336
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Ladarious Webb

    he's about as good as they have right now aside from CW
    World Domination 3 Points at a Time!




  6. #6

    Re: Ladarious Webb

    He hits like a safety and I'm sure he'd do it if he was asked, because that seems to play to his strength (punching people's lights out).

    I heard him talk about it in an interview right after he was drafted.

    When asked, he said he'd been put at CB (not by the Ravens; he'd just been drafted & this would have been about college coaches) because, with the way he plays, he'd have a very short career at safety. Too much time in the meat grinder for a guy his size.
    Festivus

    His definitions and arguments were so clear in his own mind that he was unable to understand how any reasonable person could honestly differ with him.




  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The Land of Verdite
    Posts
    12,071
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Ladarious Webb

    The only issues with Webb are that his off-coverage needs work and he struggles against more physical receivers. He is still young and has time to develop.

    Chuck Pagano is just going to have to be even more selective, given the opponent, of when he brings his safeties up. Chris Carr, in all honesty, wouldn't have done much better. He does not give up too many major plays, but he is always giving up too much ground.
    Last edited by The Excellector; 09-19-2011 at 09:36 AM.
    "When questioned, the Elders explained that they were in search of magical powers. However, they're actually searching for the whereabouts of a certain ring. This ring is a legendary treasure that long ago was known to exist"




  8. #8

    Re: Ladarious Webb

    Quote Originally Posted by RavensNTerps View Post
    Well the truth is Jimmy Smith and Chris Carr are our two best cover guys (we hope with Smith, obviously). They're also injured.
    I wasn't talking about making the move now...I realize that he and CW were not only the best we had, but pretty much all we had/have until Carr and Smith are healthy.

    I'm talking about maybe making the move next season...especially since Zibby and Ruki will be UFA's.




  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Owings Mills
    Posts
    1,651

    Re: Ladarious Webb

    In regards to safety play, is Pollard that bad in pass protection? Zibby looks lost, slow and unable to compete. He is a reason for a lot of the failed pass D yesterday IMO.
    Hating Steeler Fans Since Birth

    Section 126, Row 33




    Lets Go Flacco




  10. #10

    Re: Ladarious Webb

    Quote Originally Posted by Rayvens52 View Post
    In regards to safety play, is Pollard that bad in pass protection? Zibby looks lost, slow and unable to compete. He is a reason for a lot of the failed pass D yesterday IMO.
    Pollard was ran out of Houston due to his pass coverage "abilities".

    I don't think he is the answer when it comes to covering someone. He is an awesome blitzer though...




  11. #11

    Re: Ladarious Webb

    It's Lardarius Webb.




  12. #12

    Re: Ladarious Webb

    Quote Originally Posted by The Eternal Ring View Post
    The only issues with Webb are that his off-coverage needs work and he struggles against more physical receivers. He is still young and has time to develop.

    Chuck Pagano is just going to have to be even more selective, given the opponent, of when he brings his safeties up. Chris Carr, in all honesty, wouldn't have done much better. He does not give up too many major plays, but he is always giving up too much ground.
    Here are his issues.

    1) He struggles in man to man.
    2) He plays too soft in zone.
    3) He is too small to jam receivers at the line
    4) He is too small to break up passes thrown where receivers need to catch the ball at its highest point.

    Here are his strengths.

    1) He's an above average tackler (which is good given the number of balls that get completed on him).
    2) He's a solid blitzer from the secondary
    3) Special Teams
    4) Dreadlocks




Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russell Street Report Website Design by D3Corp Ocean City Maryland