Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 13 to 19 of 19
  1. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX Y'all
    Posts
    34,414
    Quote Originally Posted by SteelFaninBMore View Post
    7 years ago they had a dynasty. But they haven't won a playoff game since 2007.
    So you proved my point.

    They lately have wet the bed in the playoffs.

    They do not always wet the bed, which was my point.





  2. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    21,926
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: In AFC there is NE and everybody else

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonRaven View Post
    So you proved my point.

    They lately have wet the bed in the playoffs.

    They do not always wet the bed, which was my point.
    To be fair, you proved his point. They wet the bed... since 2007





  3. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wayne Manor, Gotham
    Posts
    48,859
    Blog Entries
    8

    Re: In AFC there is NE and everybody else

    Quote Originally Posted by SteelFaninBMore View Post
    We say that every year and then they choke in the first round. Yawn.
    Absolutely. You can't judge the Patriots or Jets based on their regular season records.





  4. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The Land of Verdite
    Posts
    53,064
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: In AFC there is NE and everybody else

    As of late, the past couple of years or so, outside of one Indianapolis Super Bowl run, the AFC playoffs have been dominated by the more physical teams. New England is not one of those teams.
    "Please take with you this final sword, The Excellector. I am praying that your journey will be guided by the light", Leon Shore





  5. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    3,009

    Re: In AFC there is NE and everybody else

    I think it's a little silly to say that a team can or can't perform well in the playoffs based on past performance. First off, there just aren't many payoff games to judge teams by. At least not in a recent enough time horizon for them to be relevant.

    Second, you could argue that it's all irrelevant anyway. Teams take on different personalities from year-to-year. They get hot at different times year-to-year.

    You may think you see trends because someone does something the same way for 2-3 years, but again that goes back to small sample size. That's as likely to be coincidence as a trend.





  6. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX Y'all
    Posts
    34,414
    Quote Originally Posted by NCRAVEN View Post
    To be fair, you proved his point. They wet the bed... since 2007
    No.

    The point I contested was they "always" wet the bed. It's only been recently as they do have three rings.

    Ergo, nothing "always" about them losing in the playoffs.





  7. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    21,926
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: In AFC there is NE and everybody else

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonRaven View Post
    No.

    The point I contested was they "always" wet the bed. It's only been recently as they do have three rings.

    Ergo, nothing "always" about them losing in the playoffs.
    It was actually "every time" not "always" but whose counting.

    That aside I'm sure the Superbowl wins where excluded from that statement.

    The point remains they shit the bed in the playoffs since 2007. Do I think that happens this year? Too early to tell, show me a team that can get consistent pressure with the front 4 and play descent press coverage and I think this year will be the same as last for them.





Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Link To Mobile Site
var infolinks_pid = 3297965; var infolinks_wsid = 0; //—->