Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Columbia, Maryland
    Posts
    1,179

    Re: JO: "Offense Not On Same Page."



    Ooops. I caught what you were talking about. I meant to post the link to an article and not this MB. I'll fix it.
    It's a new season! It's a new day!




  2. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Columbia, Maryland
    Posts
    1,179

    Re: JO: "Offense Not On Same Page."

    Mike Preston also views the responses from McNair, Mason, and Ogden as a positive. Our offense is no longer in denial.
    It's a new season! It's a new day!




  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    White Marsh
    Posts
    270

    Re: JO: "Offense Not On Same Page."

    they have to work this out and i am glad to see that more than Mason think so. last year, he was the only one that seemed to get pissed the offense sucked.

    this offensive output will not do. if they play like they did today, we will lose a lot of games. you can not start inside the opposition's 40 for 4 drives and only put up 12 points. it was disgusting. they did not even eat the clock. a lot of short drives putting the defense out there. if we were not given a short field for the bulk of that game, the outcome would have been a lot closer.

    i will reserve judgement for now, but too much dink and dunk crap, never opening the field up is going to hinder this team. right now we look like 2003. defense and running game only. not going to cut it.




  4. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Breckenridge, CO
    Posts
    334

    Re: JO: "Offense Not On Same Page."

    I'm glad to see that the offense is taking responsibility for their lack of production. No pointing fingers or making excuses. That's refreshing.




  5. #20

    Re: JO: "Offense Not On Same Page."

    Good teams find a way to win on days they don't have their best stuff. Yeah the O line was having problems but sacks were not a problem and we were able to play ball control. JO will get this staighted out and Billick will see to it. He dosen't want JO in his face anymore. Would You?




  6. #21

    Re: JO: "Offense Not On Same Page."

    Yeah the O line was having problems but sacks were not a problem and we were able to play ball control.
    Actually we didn't play ball control. We punted 7 times and had the same number of total 1st downs as the Raiders when you count penalties in. Their TOP was only 5 minutes less than ours. The defense played ball control.




Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russell Street Report Website Design by D3Corp Ocean City Maryland