Results 1 to 12 of 14
Thread: 2003 NFL draft
-
03-06-2007, 04:04 AM #1
2003 NFL draft
DE Terrell Suggs
QB Kyle Boller,
RB Musa Smith,
DL Jarrett Johnson
FB Ovie Mughelli
OT Tony Pashos
S Gerome Sapp
Damn, looking back at that draft our FO did a hell of a job...
-
03-06-2007, 05:56 AM #2Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Columbia, Maryland
- Posts
- 1,179
-
03-06-2007, 10:22 AM #3Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Cumberland RI
- Posts
- 4,930
Re: 2003 NFL draft
Save for Boller and Musa
Thats funny. You still don't know if they'll pan out or not.
If you asked before last season, I'd definitely have said that Mughelli was a big bust. And that Jarrett Johnson was just a guy for depth. Gerome Sapp was a colt just a year ago.
Also, when you look at Boller's last 10 games, what is it like 16 TDs to just 3 INTs? We'll see about his future either in Baltimore or somewhere else soon enough.
I dont think Ozzie missed on one guy that draft, IMO. With Musa, he could still pan out and, you get what you paid for. There's a reason he slipped to the 3rd.
Apart from Dwan Edwards, I haven't seen this FO make a bad drafting move in a while (and Dwan could still pan out, its just that Starks from MD was still on the board, making it a wierd pick)
-
03-06-2007, 10:52 AM #4Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- reisterstown
- Posts
- 302
-
03-06-2007, 10:59 AM #5
Re: 2003 NFL draft
Kyle has big talent and zero football IQ."A moron, a rapist, and a Pittsburgh Steeler walk into a bar. He sits down and says, “Hi I’m Ben may I have a drink please?”
ProFootballMock
-
03-06-2007, 11:03 AM #6
Re: 2003 NFL draft
Agree about Boller, disagree about Musa Smith. Musa is/was a bust. He's had injuries but has also had opportunities. He spends half of each game laying on his back when *not* injured, which makes it harder to tell.
Concerning Boller, he is still young and may yet pan out as a pro QB in my humble opinion. However as a #19 pick in the draft, it's fair of PR to comment he's been a disappointment.
:2c:Festivus
His definitions and arguments were so clear in his own mind that he was unable to understand how any reasonable person could honestly differ with him.
-
03-06-2007, 11:35 AM #7Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 1,541
Re: 2003 NFL draft
can't ignore the context of the situation.
16 TDs 10 INTs in last 9 games, by the way....but they NEEDED to draft a QB...there was no ifs, ands, or buts about it...it was not a want, it was a need. Jeff Blake was hte best FA QB out there (unless they took a flyer on Delhomme, but now you're talking about hind sight being 20/20) and he had already turned us down. Redman was TOTALLY shot.
Now I sitll think Boller will turn out to be a pretty decnt QB, either here or elsewhere, but even if he doesn't I will never dispute the pick.
-
03-06-2007, 12:37 PM #8Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- reisterstown
- Posts
- 302
-
03-06-2007, 12:52 PM #9
Re: 2003 NFL draft
Of course the Baltimore Mcnair's went 13-3 not the Baltimore Ravens,, funny how I think he was a major part of that but I always thought I was rooting for a team...
-
03-06-2007, 02:39 PM #10Rookie Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 16
-
03-06-2007, 05:20 PM #11
Re: 2003 NFL draft
your right my bad
-
03-06-2007, 05:52 PM #12
Re: 2003 NFL draft
There is a reason this team spent a 4th round pick to get McNair. The FO would not do that if they didn't consider Boller a bust.
Bookmarks