Results 13 to 20 of 20
Thread: Now, If we re-sign Mason...
-
Re: Now, If we re-sign Mason...
Marshall would have been a better pick-up in many areas, but he would have also demanded a lot more money. Probably somewhere around 9-10M a year.
6 a year for Boldin leaves money to offer 3-4M to Mason for 2 more years and a better move. It also leaves the issues aside for a guy that is a quality leader and proven locker room guy. TE is possible, but I think a TE will still be available in the 2nd. I'm not that high on Gresham after watching his combine drills, but could still be the rust.
it's hard to say with the OZ.
You would almost think that since they let Bannan and Edwards walk that easy they would go after DL, but maybe Kruger is putting on some weight and that see and know more than we do.
-
03-06-2010, 12:15 AM #14
Re: Now, If we re-sign Mason...
Both Mason and Q on the field at the same time would be huge - both tough as nails, and super competitors! Cmon, Oz, let's get Mase signed, and I'll be feeling real good about next year's O!
"Grab those pusillanimous sons-a-bitches by the nose and kick 'em in the balls.." General George S. Patton
-
03-06-2010, 02:49 AM #15
Re: Now, If we re-sign Mason...
Come on, seriously. Boldin got dealt for a third... who the hell is going to give up a second for Clayton? We'd be lucky to get a fifth. I say we keep him for this season as a depth player... only problem is, he doesn't seem like a ST player. But yeah, we need to bring Mason back, period.
-
03-06-2010, 02:54 AM #16
Re: Now, If we re-sign Mason...
---------------------------------------------------
www.oblongspheroid.com
A blog about any and everything football.
Twitter: oblong_spheroid
-
03-06-2010, 03:35 AM #17Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Glen Burnie
- Posts
- 2,028
- Blog Entries
- 3
-
03-06-2010, 01:21 PM #18
Re: Now, If we re-sign Mason...
I agree, someone is on some serious crack or delusional or has no idea how to rate talent. a 2 for Clayton?!?! Really? Wake up Dude, what Clayton have you been watching all these years? If we were offered a 6 or 7 I would jump all over it. I have always liked Clayton & kept thinking & wishing he would finally break thru, but sadly it has never happened.
My youngest son Kyle w/ Michael Phelps after the Browms game 12/24/11
Season Ticket Holder Since 96,
Loud, Proud & Purple in Section 504. GO RAVENS, all the way to Indy for the Lombardi!!!
-
03-06-2010, 02:09 PM #19
Re: Now, If we re-sign Mason...
At this point I think the best thing to do would be to keep as many of the Wrs we had around as possible. Boldin changes all the match ups even if he does not draw constant double coverage (which I think he will).
Mason working 1 on 1 vs the #2 Cb and Clayton or Stallworth out there as well in a 4 wide look should be a matchup nightmare for most teams. Clayton may not have been consistant vs #2 Cbs, but he should consistantly get open vs guys like Frank Walker and Corey Ivy. The Ravens 4th and 5th Cbs are actually likley a lot better than average, and now we have enough good WRs to go 4 wide and expose those players on other teams the way Peyton and Brees were on the way to the SB.
We also need to improve the front 4 pass rush and Cb depth so we do not have to try to cove Collie and Garcon with Ivy next postseason, but at this point I have no doubt we will be there.
:T2:
-
03-08-2010, 11:29 PM #20
Re: Now, If we re-sign Mason...
"Grab those pusillanimous sons-a-bitches by the nose and kick 'em in the balls.." General George S. Patton
Bookmarks