Results 13 to 24 of 44
Thread: Jim Leonard
-
01-18-2010, 02:23 PM #13
-
01-18-2010, 02:24 PM #14
-
01-18-2010, 02:30 PM #15
Re: Jim Leonard
I'm far from certain that either Zibs or a healthy Nakamura would be as good as Leonhard ...that said, I'm not criticizing either the Ravens for letting Leonhard go or the Jets for paying him $$$ to play in NY. Money likely factors into this from the Ravens standpoint, too. Just sayin' I think he's a good player, has done very well this year as a starting safety, and if he stays healthy should certainly have a fine career and be a big plus for the Jets.Last edited by trailhiker85; 01-18-2010 at 02:35 PM.
-
01-18-2010, 07:57 PM #16
Re: Jim Leonard
Jim Leonard, in my opinion is a better safety than Dawan Landry. He can also run back punts and kickoffs well, too. He is a guy who made some key plays in Sunday's game against the Chargers.
He brings an energy to the game, very much like Ray Lewis, and is always around the football. I miss him and I think it was a huge mistake in not resigning him.
-
01-18-2010, 09:03 PM #17
Re: Jim Leonard
Sorry, R&T, but that's totally illogical.:insane:
We had 5 safeties on the roster to start the 2008 season -- no one was planning on Landry would get hurt. There was just as much room on the 2009 roster.
The problem was the Ozzie just blew it. It was obvious that Leonhard had earned a starting job, and that Landry, coming off a major injury, would be questionable.
Dumb decision by the Ravens -- right up there with hiring Mattison and letting Stover go.In a 2003 BBC poll that asked Brits to name the "Greatest American Ever", Mr. T came in fourth, behind ML King (3rd), Abe Lincoln (2nd) and Homer Simpson (1st).
-
01-18-2010, 09:12 PM #18
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Westminster - Raventown, MD!
- Posts
- 13,099
- Blog Entries
- 1
Re: Jim Leonard
I've got to disagree with you there T...while I will agree Leonard has PROVEN himself, Landry has played decently, so I wouldn't say it's a complete whiff by Ozzie. Landry is younger and cheaper, and plays pretty decently when healthy. Half this season he was rusty, but he really came on in the 2nd half...
And saying the decision to hire Mattison was a bad one is also illogical. Mattison had some weak moments this season, but his defense was Top 10 for a 1st year coordinator...Consider also, he lost one starting CB and the replacement for that CB in the 2nd half of the season, he was trying to get the Bart Scott replacement working in the defense, he played a portion of the season without the rush end we just signed to a 6 year deal...And yet, his defense was still Top 10. Mattison is going to be a good coordinator, time will show that. He may not be crazy with his schemes like Rex Ryan, but he's going to find the way to get our defense to work. I think he showed that in adjustments made over the course of the season.
The Stover one I will give you. Cundiff redeemed Ozzie and Harbaugh at the end of the season a bit, but Stover showed he could still kick well and we never showed that an extra roster spot really helped us all that much..
.
“When I think of a Baltimore Raven - we go in there, we take your lunch box, we take your sandwich, we take your juice box, we take your applesauce, and we take your spork and we break it. And we leave you with an empty lunch. That’s the Baltimore Raven way.” - Steve Smith Sr.
Call me a Special Teams coach again. I dare you! I double dare you, MFer!
-
Re: Jim Leonard
I'll take a plate of crow on this one.
Although Landry was playing much, much better during the second half of the season.
-
01-18-2010, 10:33 PM #20Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 1,541
Re: Jim Leonard
1) Hiring Mattison was dumb, how? He coordinated the #3 defense in the NFL. Remember 2007 when we lost our top 3 DBs? What happened? The D collapsed, totally. This year, it didn't.
2) Yeah, but with Landry coming back and the 2 safeties we drafted (drafted players will always get preference, hate it or love it), there was no way we were going to keep Leonhard. He's one of my favorite players and I desperately wanted to keep him, but I see the logic in why we didn't re-sign him.
-
01-18-2010, 11:05 PM #21
Re: Jim Leonard
You can not keep them all. We got Leonard off the street as an untendered FA from the Bills. They are the ones that really should have the regrets about him. The Ravens had Landry, Zibs, Nakamura and Reed all under contract, and not much cap room and other needs more pressing than another saftey, even a really good one with return skills.
:T2:
-
01-19-2010, 05:17 AM #22
Re: Jim Leonard
Landry had a rough start to the season (as did, you know, the entire secondary), but he was quietly terrific down the stretch. He was a beast against the run and made a number of very nice plays against the pass.
I like Leonhard, and he's a fan favorite as a little guy with lots of heart, but he'll always be limited by his physical attributes.ERIG20, your local draftnik
Signature currently under construction
-
01-19-2010, 09:46 AM #23Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 1,541
-
01-19-2010, 04:31 PM #24
Re: Jim Leonard
I was a big fan of Leonhard's play last season and I think we should have found a way to re-sign him.
Ozzie is still doing a damn good job. It's impossible to get every call right.
Bookmarks