Results 13 to 24 of 27
-
06-10-2009, 09:47 AM #13
-
Re: Sometimes it's Better to Have to "Settle" for Your Second Choice
Leftwich should make the team. He's better than McCown and Josh Johnson is a major project.
Leftwich will probably start the 1st half of this season while they figure out if the rook, Freeman, will be able to go.Disclaimer: The content posted is of my own opinion.
-
06-10-2009, 11:14 AM #15Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 226
-
06-12-2009, 02:39 PM #16
-
06-12-2009, 05:36 PM #17
Re: Sometimes it's Better to Have to "Settle" for Your Second Choice
Leftwich's college injuries always made him a risky investment at best anyway.
His selection by the Jags was a gamble that eventually cost them somewhat, yet allowed them to discover the diamond in the rough that is Garrard.
-
06-13-2009, 08:57 AM #18
Re: Sometimes it's Better to Have to "Settle" for Your Second Choice
Festivus
His definitions and arguments were so clear in his own mind that he was unable to understand how any reasonable person could honestly differ with him.
-
06-14-2009, 09:50 AM #19Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 226
Re: Sometimes it's Better to Have to "Settle" for Your Second Choice
Trap, you're right about Art preferring Phillips. But the point is that they had their choice between Phillips and Ogden, and took Odgen. So that's not an example of settling for a second choice. That's an example of a near miss...making the right decision.
Troy Smith is another example, of sorts, of settling for a second choice, according to some who believe the Ravens were interested in fellow Cleveland native, Brady Quinn and the Browns wanted him more. It remains to be seen which is the better player. At this point Smith, a fifth rounder, seems like a better value.
-
06-14-2009, 10:11 AM #20
Re: Sometimes it's Better to Have to "Settle" for Your Second Choice
Trap, most of the regular posters on the board, including myself, are familiar with that chapter in Ravens history. The Ravens FO was split - the owner wanted Philips, the GM wanted Ogden. They went with Ogden, making him their first choice. They never had to "settle." They had to decide, and they did.
Festivus
His definitions and arguments were so clear in his own mind that he was unable to understand how any reasonable person could honestly differ with him.
-
06-15-2009, 08:35 AM #21
Re: Sometimes it's Better to Have to "Settle" for Your Second Choice
Yeah but the one big settle no one has brought up is Harbaugh over Jason Garrett.
When Garrett and his wife left the castle after the initial discussion about the position his wife looked like she had something bad in her mouth but couldn't spit it out. She did not look happy.
I'm so glad we got Harbaugh. I really really like his leadership skills and vision. Plus he knows how to hire great assisstants. I"m also curious to see how his drafting/recruting "character" guys pays off-or not.
-
06-15-2009, 09:42 AM #22
Re: Sometimes it's Better to Have to "Settle" for Your Second Choice
-
06-15-2009, 03:15 PM #23
-
06-15-2009, 04:35 PM #24Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 4,610
Re: Sometimes it's Better to Have to "Settle" for Your Second Choice
It still remains to be seen how good of a HC Garrett will be. I believe he will be a better HC than coordinator. I do think the Ravens go lucky in not landing him instead of Harbaugh. Without Harbaugh I highly doubt Cam would be the OC and Hue would be the QB coach. Those two are directly responsible for the successful offense with rookie Flacco. Hopefully we can say the same things about Mattison after this year!
Bookmarks