Results 49 to 60 of 80
Thread: Nestor/NST reaches new low
-
08-30-2006, 09:15 PM #49
Re: Nestor/NST reaches new low
Originally Posted by RavenDomination
If the GENERAL ASSEMBLY didn't liked what the Gov. - any Gov. - was influencing, they wouldn't pass the Law. If you've been paying any attention to anything at all recently, that would be pretty evident to you.
And, BTW, the age of consent law has been on the books since BEFORE Ehrlich took office, so Drew's original statement had absolutely NO merit whatsoever. My prior post was made when this thread was still on the main board, so I wasn't going to bring politics into it - although that is what Drew did - so I just made it a generic statement about Governors not being the ones passing the Laws.Last edited by B-more Ravor; 08-30-2006 at 09:34 PM.
-
08-30-2006, 09:35 PM #50On The Practice Squad
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 78
Re: Nestor/NST reaches new low
Did Erlich vote for the Medi-Care increase a few years back?
Was he in support of the increase from $94 a year to $790?
I forget.
Or was that the General Assembly that did that?
-
08-30-2006, 09:49 PM #51
Re: Nestor/NST reaches new low
Originally Posted by df1570
And, BTW, the age of consent law has been on the books since BEFORE Ehrlich took office, so Drew's original statement had absolutely NO merit whatsoever. My prior post was made when this thread was still on the main board, so I wasn't going to bring politics into it - although that is what Drew did - so I just made it a generic statement about Governors not being the ones passing the Laws.
Last edited by B-more Ravor; 08-30-2006 at 10:03 PM.
-
08-31-2006, 06:17 AM #52Rookie Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Rising Sun
- Posts
- 1
Re: Nestor/NST reaches new low
Maybe the 16 year old girls father could give Art ( the Saint) his $20 backfor 1 hour with him in an alley Nester is a piece of crap , you can justiy this any way you want its still child molesting( he paid her after the act , what a guy). Cut his nuts off and give them to Nester and Drew since they seem to enjoy them.
-
08-31-2006, 09:46 AM #53Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 367
Re: Nestor/NST reaches new low
Originally Posted by df1570
-
08-31-2006, 09:55 AM #54
Re: Nestor/NST reaches new low
Originally Posted by PurpleRulz
At 61 you wouldn't want to have sex with an 18 year old? Plllleeeeeeaaaseeeeeee.
-
08-31-2006, 11:05 AM #55Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 367
Re: Nestor/NST reaches new low
Originally Posted by losac
The girl was 16. The debate is whether he knew it or not. Did he do anything to make sure she was 18? She is a minor. She was above the age of consent. If I found that a 61 yr old perv manipluated my 16 yr old daughter into meeting him and giving him oral and he then proceeded to give her $20. The courts would be the last thing he had to worry about. The same goes if she were 18.
-
08-31-2006, 02:05 PM #56
Re: Nestor/NST reaches new low
At 61 I might want to have sex with an 18 year old, or maybe even a 16 year old, if she was attractive. But I have this ability to restrain my urges and make positive choices. I try and not act on the first urge that hits my crotch and disregard the consequences for me, the young lady, my family and who knows how many other people. It's called being a man.
I have a feeling the same people that think this is okay probably had took little issue with the President doing something similar in the Oval Office. You can say the blowjob is no big deal in either case, and maybe so. What is a big deal is the complete disregard for the consequences of the action and the fact that these supposedly mature men decided to get their rocks off and chance those consequences. Basically, they said "Fuck whoever this hurts, I want a blowjob!"
People who exhibit this kind of judgement should be derided.
I will say this, at least Sinclair, in this interview, showed remorse.
-
08-31-2006, 03:57 PM #57
Re: Nestor/NST reaches new low
She is also a "child" - by any definition
child (chld)
n. pl. chil·dren (chldrn)
1. A person between birth and puberty.
I'm not sure how on earth that one got passed, but a 16-year old should NOT be allowed to consent to having sex.
What Sinclair did was obviously tactless, but it involved two human beings making decisions that affect themselves only. Of course, except for the doing what they did in public part. I wouldn't say Sinclair was right in doing what he did, but he hardly committed an awful crime
-
08-31-2006, 04:09 PM #58
Re: Nestor/NST reaches new low
What Sinclair did was obviously tactless, but it involved two human beings making decisions that affect themselves only.
-
08-31-2006, 04:47 PM #59
Re: Nestor/NST reaches new low
Be careful not to twist Brazil's words. He's not saying it's OK for 60 year-old men to have sex with 15 and 16 year-old girls. He's not defending pedophilia, either.
After all, we have a new tone around here, and I wouldn't want anyone to make the same mistakes others frequently made when reading his views on this particular subject at the old place.
Just to be perfectly clear: it's only OK for 60 year-old men to boink adolescent girls when they can talk them into it.Last edited by RavenMad2099; 08-31-2006 at 05:01 PM.
THE 2nd WAVE LOYAL™
© 2007 DRayRaven Enterprises™. All rights reserved, patent pending.
The contents of this post may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the express written consent
of DRayRaven, ProFootball 24x7, the Baltimore Ravens, the National Football League, or related entities.
-
08-31-2006, 05:23 PM #60Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 367
Re: Nestor/NST reaches new low
Originally Posted by RavensInBrazil
Recent studies indicate that at least half of all babies born to minor women are fathered by adult men.1 In addition, there is a widespread perception that these young mothers account for the large increase in welfare caseloads over the last 25 years. As a result, a growing number of policymakers are embracing the notion that adolescent pregnancy rates can be lowered and welfare costs reduced if states more rigorously enforce statutory rape laws prohibiting sex ual intercourse between adults and minors.
In the last year, several states have taken steps to punish men who violate these laws. Meanwhile, the new federal welfare law urges that "states and local jurisdictions...aggressively enforce statutory rape laws" and requires state welfare plans to outline an education and training program for law enforcement officials, counselors and educators that focuses on "the problem of statutory rape." It also directs the attorney general to implement a program to study the connection between statutory rape and adolescent pregnancy, with particular attention to "predatory older men."Last edited by ravenmaniac; 08-31-2006 at 05:29 PM.
Bookmarks