Results 49 to 60 of 78
-
07-27-2008, 02:18 PM #49
Re: Kucinich Introduces Single Article of Impeachment for President Bush
Was he President then?
Thanks for playing, as a consolation prize you will receive a year's supply of Rice-A-Roni at your local grocery store and all you have to do is buy it.
-
07-27-2008, 11:10 PM #50
Re: Kucinich Introduces Single Article of Impeachment for President Bush
-
07-28-2008, 12:24 AM #51
Re: Kucinich Introduces Single Article of Impeachment for President Bush
I have no idea what you are talking about but I am quite sure there isn't a high crime or misdemeanor committed by Bush while in office involved.
-
07-28-2008, 01:11 AM #52
Re: Kucinich Introduces Single Article of Impeachment for President Bush
Here is some advice - If you are going to use a Bush/Coke reference you might not want to do it just after singing Lord Obama's praises. Plenty of coke stories out there about him as well. One Chicago dood claims he did coke and had gay sex with Barry. That trumps a good ole coke party any day.
But you Kos MoveOn ers keep dreaming. If you can get Bush impeached maybe you can score one of those hot Code Pink chicks. Assuming they know what a penis is.
-
07-28-2008, 08:53 AM #53
-
07-28-2008, 09:12 AM #54Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Houston, TX Y'all
- Posts
- 34,414
-
07-28-2008, 09:18 AM #55
Re: Kucinich Introduces Single Article of Impeachment for President Bush
It sucks to have someone you refer to as "stupid" correct your spelling but I'm in a generous mood onto the point idiot.
Germany and Italy were part of the Tripartite Pact signed along with Japan in March of 1941. Hitler and Mussolini declared war on the United States on December 11, 1941, the Allies which included the United States didn't land on mainland Italy until September of '43 long after war was declared.
Vietnam was another poor excuse because the United States did not invade South Vietnam.
Saddam Hussien never declared war on the United States and history has proven there was no threat at all!
No amount of excuses can change the fact that bush spearheaded the invasion and occupation of a nation that intended us no harm and hadn't the capability of doing it even if they had the intention. On a side note bush toppled Iran's natural enemies on both doorsteps making Iran (the real threat to the free world) a major power in the region.
The Taliban should have been eradicated but bush couldn't keep his eye on Afghanistan because it lacked the oil reserves of his ultimate quest.
Iraq was never a fight about the United States being in "imminent danger" , it was about oil and obscene profits for Dick Cheney's Haliburton.
-
07-28-2008, 09:26 AM #56
-
07-28-2008, 10:12 AM #57Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Houston, TX Y'all
- Posts
- 34,414
Re: Kucinich Introduces Single Article of Impeachment for President Bush
Again with the selective memory.
The ENTIRE Security Council, each country with their own intelligence aparatus, came to the exact same conslusion about Iraq. Not ONE country offered anything to the contrary. You act as if Powell was the only person who spoke prior to that vote.
You're entitled to your own opinion about W (which I happen to share with you) but you're not entitled to your own set of facts.
-
07-28-2008, 10:16 AM #58Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Houston, TX Y'all
- Posts
- 34,414
Re: Kucinich Introduces Single Article of Impeachment for President Bush
Maybe you should read the thread before making comments on someone's stupidity.
The claim was made that the US had NEVER attacked a country based on the possibility of a threat. We have a long history of doing just that.
Whether or not we SHOULD have invaded Iraq or any other country is certainly a matter of debate and not what I or the other poster were discussing.
You shouldn’t dip without a chip.
-
07-28-2008, 11:25 AM #59
Re: Kucinich Introduces Single Article of Impeachment for President Bush
Kid it looks like you aren't able to make distinctions between being at war and attacking another nation or starting one by invading another nation. I guess I need to spell it all out next time . I usually give people credit for being a tad more intelligent than a total moron.
-
07-28-2008, 11:54 AM #60Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Houston, TX Y'all
- Posts
- 34,414
Re: Kucinich Introduces Single Article of Impeachment for President Bush
You may want to look up what an ad homonym attack means when it’s pulled during a debate. To all reading this thread, please note the tolerant and progressive RustonRifle had to resort to name calling when he ran out of facts. Moron = a conservative winning a debate against a Liberal.
You didn’t score very well on your reading comprehension portion of your SAT's, did you? I mean really, can it be more obvious what this thread was about yet you hijacked it with your own thoughts?
In any event, kudos to you in your endeavor to regurgitate the talking points of MoveOn/Kos/Huffington.
Bookmarks