Results 13 to 15 of 15
Thread: Rays status in question again?
-
11-14-2006, 03:56 PM #13Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 2,486
Re: Rays status in question again?
Moving Scott to ILB and activating Cody means you would have 2 players at new positions to replace 1 injured player. That doesn't make sense.
-
11-14-2006, 04:36 PM #14
Re: Rays status in question again?
This is true. But just because he played well there last year does not mean you can plug him into MLB on one weeks notice (practice time) and not expect him to have some rust in terms of assignments and reads. I disagree with weakening a position of strength - which is what Bart has been on the outside.2 reasons:
1. He got hurt; and most likely is not the same player they drafted (and may never be).
2. He is not worthy of the spot based on his performance in practice.
Sorry, I refuse to believe that the coaches have any other agenda other than putting the best players on the starting team and in the rotations and situational packages. If Cody is not on the field, it is because he's either not fully healed and/or Haley (filling in for Mike Smith) is better at this point at LB and Pryce and Suggs are better at DE.
-
11-14-2006, 08:30 PM #15Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 2,486
Re: Rays status in question again?
Well, you might be right, but if a practice squad guy like Haley is seen by the coaches as better than Cody, then Cody is either not fully recovered from his injury, or the FO should never have drafted him so highly to begin with.
Bookmarks