Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 16

Thread: Jamal Has to go

  1. #1

    Jamal Has to go



    We can't run on the Tits. That is just freaking nuts. I am tired of the Tap dancing. This is a disgrace.




  2. #2

    Re: Jamal Has to go

    There's no where to run. There's 11 guys on the field for us, not just Jamal.




  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Huddersfield, England
    Posts
    968

    Re: Jamal Has to go

    Titans always stop us running, but guess what - it leaves MASSIVE holes downfield. How ever many yards McNair has, some should be credited to Jamal being on the field.

    I understand your frustration, but we now have a QB that can make them pay for stacking the box. Again, that's Jamal's work.
    Last edited by UKRaven; 11-12-2006 at 04:49 PM. Reason: typo




  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Southeast England,where the only Raven flag flutters.
    Posts
    1,539

    Re: Jamal Has to go

    Jamal seriously needs to consider going on Dancing with the Stars.
    Put the smile back on your face.This is a 60 minute ball game.




  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    SW Florida (Venice area)
    Posts
    532

    Re: Jamal Has to go

    Jamal is the 8-track of running backs. DEACTIVATE HIM AND LET'S SEE ONE OF THE TWO ROOKIES.

    What's that, Brian? Oh yeah, loyalty. I guess tht DOES count.
    ENFORCE THE 1ST AMENDMENT WITH THE SECOND, NEVER DISARM




  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denver, Colorado (via Gaithersburg, MD)
    Posts
    677
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Jamal Has to go

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenatic20 View Post
    There's no where to run. There's 11 guys on the field for us, not just Jamal.
    Baloney. It's Jamal.

    Bench the fucker and start Mike Anderson. I promise you he kicks Jamal's stutter-step, tap-dancing ass.




  7. #7

    Re: Jamal Has to go

    Yeah... that fumble sure showed what MA can do.

    The Tits committed to the run and left the passing game open. We took what they gave us.

    Anyone have the breakdown of run/pass ratio of this game?




  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Now live from Pittsburgh for work
    Posts
    6,840

    Re: Jamal Has to go

    I saw holes to be had today, and Jamal hit a whopping one of them. You have to have better production against a D that gives up 5 YPC.

    edit: You can't take away everything else a different back gives you because he had a fumble on his only carry. Jamal fumbles all the freaking time.




  9. #9

    Re: Jamal Has to go

    Quote Originally Posted by OldBay View Post
    Yeah... that fumble sure showed what MA can do.

    The Tits committed to the run and left the passing game open. We took what they gave us.

    Anyone have the breakdown of run/pass ratio of this game?


    I'll rack that, and note McNair threw 47 times to 21 rushes.

    - C -




  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    SW Florida (Venice area)
    Posts
    532

    Re: Jamal Has to go

    Guys named Jamal do better when thay are riding camels across the Sahara.
    ENFORCE THE 1ST AMENDMENT WITH THE SECOND, NEVER DISARM




  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Cub Hill, MD
    Posts
    2,544

    Re: Jamal Has to go

    If we can't run on the Bungs and the Tits, or against the Saints, three of the worst run Ds in the NFL, we will not go deep into the playoffs.

    Just sayin'.


    WORLD CHAMPIONS 2000 * 2012




  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sparks, MD
    Posts
    621

    Re: Jamal Has to go

    FACT -- in 2000-03 -- Jamal was one of the top 5-6 backs statistically in all the stats that mattered


    FACT in 2006 -- He barely makes the top 40 (FORTY --GUYS!) -- see football outsider stats . It isn't even close. Any half decent back would do better than Jamal.

    http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/rb.php

    If we don't give Musa a try, it will yet be another potentially cheap young talent that will do great on another team. We've seen this movie before (e.g., Rabach) . If we're not using Anderson, why did we pay him?

    And for all the whining from the coaches, that he's almost there -- look at that stats -- there have been hardly any big runs this year from him and that's what counts


    http://www.footballoutsiders.com/200...eep-zone/4506/




Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russell Street Report Website Design by D3Corp Ocean City Maryland