Results 1 to 12 of 16
Thread: Jamal Has to go
-
11-12-2006, 04:14 PM #1Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 494
Jamal Has to go
We can't run on the Tits. That is just freaking nuts. I am tired of the Tap dancing. This is a disgrace.
-
11-12-2006, 04:17 PM #2
Re: Jamal Has to go
There's no where to run. There's 11 guys on the field for us, not just Jamal.
-
11-12-2006, 05:48 PM #3
Re: Jamal Has to go
Titans always stop us running, but guess what - it leaves MASSIVE holes downfield. How ever many yards McNair has, some should be credited to Jamal being on the field.
I understand your frustration, but we now have a QB that can make them pay for stacking the box. Again, that's Jamal's work.Last edited by UKRaven; 11-12-2006 at 05:49 PM. Reason: typo
-
11-12-2006, 05:49 PM #4
Re: Jamal Has to go
Jamal seriously needs to consider going on Dancing with the Stars.
Put the smile back on your face.This is a 60 minute ball game.
-
11-12-2006, 05:59 PM #5
Re: Jamal Has to go
Jamal is the 8-track of running backs. DEACTIVATE HIM AND LET'S SEE ONE OF THE TWO ROOKIES.
What's that, Brian? Oh yeah, loyalty. I guess tht DOES count.ENFORCE THE 1ST AMENDMENT WITH THE SECOND, NEVER DISARM
-
11-12-2006, 06:01 PM #6
-
11-12-2006, 06:04 PM #7Rookie Poster
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 9
Re: Jamal Has to go
Yeah... that fumble sure showed what MA can do.
The Tits committed to the run and left the passing game open. We took what they gave us.
Anyone have the breakdown of run/pass ratio of this game?
-
11-12-2006, 06:05 PM #8
Re: Jamal Has to go
I saw holes to be had today, and Jamal hit a whopping one of them. You have to have better production against a D that gives up 5 YPC.
edit: You can't take away everything else a different back gives you because he had a fumble on his only carry. Jamal fumbles all the freaking time.
-
11-12-2006, 06:10 PM #9
-
11-12-2006, 06:13 PM #10
Re: Jamal Has to go
Guys named Jamal do better when thay are riding camels across the Sahara.
ENFORCE THE 1ST AMENDMENT WITH THE SECOND, NEVER DISARM
-
11-12-2006, 06:15 PM #11
Re: Jamal Has to go
If we can't run on the Bungs and the Tits, or against the Saints, three of the worst run Ds in the NFL, we will not go deep into the playoffs.
Just sayin'.
WORLD CHAMPIONS 2000 * 2012
-
11-12-2006, 06:48 PM #12Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Sparks, MD
- Posts
- 631
Re: Jamal Has to go
FACT -- in 2000-03 -- Jamal was one of the top 5-6 backs statistically in all the stats that mattered
FACT in 2006 -- He barely makes the top 40 (FORTY --GUYS!) -- see football outsider stats . It isn't even close. Any half decent back would do better than Jamal.
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/rb.php
If we don't give Musa a try, it will yet be another potentially cheap young talent that will do great on another team. We've seen this movie before (e.g., Rabach) . If we're not using Anderson, why did we pay him?
And for all the whining from the coaches, that he's almost there -- look at that stats -- there have been hardly any big runs this year from him and that's what counts
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/200...eep-zone/4506/
Bookmarks