Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 25 to 29 of 29
  1. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Deep in the bowels of Maryland suburbia
    Posts
    2,580

    Re: This should put an end to the Mangold talk.



    Quote Originally Posted by JAB1985 View Post
    sounds like if/when it heals hell be an option for us. This only confirms the reason wasnt money, not that there wasnt mutual interest.

    its no different than a player coming off PUP or IR if hes healthy enough between weeks 6-12.

    If the foots still giving him that much of an issue, its probably unlikely, but I dont think what hes saying, that he was/is to hurt to play closes the door when were talking about week 4 and having major issues along our line.
    Still clinging on, hey? Well, if it makes you happy...





  2. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    16,696
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: This should put an end to the Mangold talk.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bhcforlife View Post
    They are better off now than they would have been had they signed Mangold anyway IMO. As long as they re-sign him, Jensen should have the C position locked down for a while. At least until he gets hurt.
    I believe (?) Jensen is a UFA in 2018... Bc





  3. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Dark Side of the Moon
    Posts
    149

    Re: This should put an end to the Mangold talk.

    Quote Originally Posted by BcRaven View Post
    I believe (?) Jensen is a UFA in 2018... Bc
    He is. If he continues to hold his own, the Ravens might want to start talking with him about extension. No one thought Wagner was going to get big money and leave. The same could be very true for Jensen. If they're not going to keep him, they best make sure Skura is ready to roll for next year.
    Got to keep the loonies on the path





  4. #28

    Re: This should put an end to the Mangold talk.

    This was obvious as could be when he didn't sign with anyone by the time training camp started.
    Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.





  5. Re: This should put an end to the Mangold talk.

    If the foot's still bothering him, then why not have surgery, unless the problem cannot be surgically repaired. If that's the case, then it's a chronic issue, and at 33 he's done.





Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russell Street Report Website Design by D3Corp Ocean City Maryland