Results 13 to 24 of 47
-
10-18-2006, 11:02 AM #13
Re: Stat comparison updated, 2006 QBs only
I don't define arm strength as the ability to lob a ball 50 yards. I define arm strength as the ability to get the ball into tight spots with accuracy, to lead a receiver at full sprint (several on that drive), and the ability to make throws to the sideline (also one on that drive).
I KNOW that Mac hasn't made very good throws so far this season, and I am not giving him a pass on those, but this contention that he has a noodle arm (after throwing 3000+ yards just one year ago) is silly. The guy didn't just wake up one day and his arm was completely atrophied. :grbac:
In fact...that INT last Sunday was well OVER-thrown and on a rope. The strength is there...the accuracy just sucks.
The key statement from both yourself and T is "I guess".
I won't go so far as to say that he has the same arm he did in '99...but all this noodle-arm talk is just a way for T to harp on a decision that he was agaisnt before Mac ever put on a purple jersey or tossed a single ball.
anyway...just my .02
-
10-18-2006, 11:13 AM #14
Re: Stat comparison updated, 2006 QBs only
Well, I was FOR getting McNair, but I see the same thing, we don't go deep with McNair. In comes Boller and we go deep 6 times. McNair can throw a nice ball but it is all touch and no zip. And his sideline throws...I hold my breath every time. It seems like it takes a week to get out there.
-
10-18-2006, 11:21 AM #15
Re: Stat comparison updated, 2006 QBs only
I think we are going to find out once and for all against NO...
My guess is that Billick is going to stop babying Mac and call some deep routes...it seemed obvious to me last week that Fassil was the reason there was a shift in the calls Boller was getting vs. what Mac was asked to do.
Also...remember that Mac sent a good pass in Mason's direction last week...and mason dropped it. =(
-
10-18-2006, 12:50 PM #16
Re: Stat comparison updated, 2006 QBs only
all this noodle-arm talk is just a way for T to harp on a decision that he was agaisnt before Mac ever put on a purple jersey or tossed a single ball.
anyway...just my .02
Again: I'll eat all my words if McNair can turn things around and become a quality starter. I want nothing more than Ravens victories. I am not relishing the idea of going down to the Big Easy next weekend for an ass-kicking in the Dome.:bag:
Anyway, talk about "harping on a decision": how many Ravens fans who initially saw McNair as the franchise savior are now just simply ignoring his mediocrity?
As to arm strength, I somewhat agree with Greg. It's not just the inability to throw long. It's the inability to throw mid-range, even short, with zip and accuracy.
:T2:
-
10-18-2006, 04:00 PM #17
Re: Stat comparison updated, 2006 QBs only
Anyway, talk about "harping on a decision": how many Ravens fans who initially saw McNair as the franchise savior are now just simply ignoring his mediocrity?
I still think he has a couple more serious runs in him and that his arm strength isn't as bad as some are making it out to be, but you are right in saying that fans who expected Mac to light it up are/were delusional.
-
10-18-2006, 04:32 PM #18
Re: Stat comparison updated, 2006 QBs only
I expected him to be better than Boller,Collins, or Culpepper, but worse than those other guys. So far I think I have been right.
Collins had too little training camp to be effective at Tenn, so it's hard to judge if he has anything left. He certainly bombed as the intial Titans starter for 2006. Everything else being equal (i.e. not considering the out-year cap impact), I agree that McNair is a better choice, but I am assuming that we could could have picked up Collins at half the price and a one-year deal, and a full training camp. I saw Collins as Wright's replacement who would have competed for the starting job, and losing the competition.
Culpepper is doing OK with Miami this year, considering the injury. He's got a lifetime rating over 90 and plenty of football ahead of him. Really can't make a call on Culpepper until next season, assuming he gets fully recovered.
I won't bother to recite the McNair vs. Boller discussion again.:grbac:
:T2:Last edited by Mista T; 10-18-2006 at 04:44 PM.
-
10-18-2006, 06:56 PM #19Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 2,486
Re: Stat comparison updated, 2006 QBs only
Remember that first drive of the Giants pre-season game? Mac can make the throws.
-
10-18-2006, 10:33 PM #20
Re: Stat comparison updated, 2006 QBs only
You mean like McNair did in Denver?
Oh wait, sorry that was a 34.6.
-
10-19-2006, 08:30 AM #21
Re: Stat comparison updated, 2006 QBs only
-
10-19-2006, 08:33 AM #22
Re: Stat comparison updated, 2006 QBs only
-
10-19-2006, 08:36 AM #23
Re: Stat comparison updated, 2006 QBs only
or even add two INTs
Well, I guess if all three of McNair's INT's were TD's we'd have totally different numbers than a 34.6 too wouldn't we?
Unbelievable.
-
10-19-2006, 08:40 AM #24
Re: Stat comparison updated, 2006 QBs only
Sigh. No now let's just add interceptions to Boller's numbers to bring them down??
Well, I guess if all three of McNair's INT's were TD's we'd have totally different numbers than a 34.6 too wouldn't we?
Unbelievable
Incomplete
TD
INT
I know that isn't how it turned out...but you can't deny the statistical improbability of what happend on Sunday.
I am simply not willing to credit Boller for the results of those plays. If they had been incomplete or INTs this board would be reacting very differently about his performacne than it is today
Bookmarks