Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 13 to 19 of 19
  1. #13

    Re: Are the Raiders Done in Oakland?

    Quote Originally Posted by RavensZ06 View Post
    I really can see the Raiders moving and possibly the chargers. I dont see moving the Rams though. Despite them having a mediocre team forever they still support them.

    Another team that never gets mentioned is Jax. They havent sold out in years, if ever and have continued blackouts as they cant even fill the required amount even with half the upper levels being tarped. Its crazy.
    St. Louis does not support the Rams. St. Louis might have one of the quietest dome stadiums in the league. St. Louis is a baseball town. If the Rams moved, no one would care.
    Let's win the f**king game.
    Joe Flacco





  2. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX Y'all
    Posts
    34,414

    Re: Are the Raiders Done in Oakland?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarcasticfury View Post
    St. Louis does not support the Rams. St. Louis might have one of the quietest dome stadiums in the league. St. Louis is a baseball town. If the Rams moved, no one would care.
    :word





  3. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    65,237
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Are the Raiders Done in Oakland?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarcasticfury View Post
    St. Louis does not support the Rams. St. Louis might have one of the quietest dome stadiums in the league. St. Louis is a baseball town. If the Rams moved, no one would care.
    Pretty much agree and that's why they are the most likely team to relocate. Jax is on the upswing and now has an owner who truly cares. They are in better shape than years and trending upward IMO.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    World Domination 3 Points at a Time!





  4. #16

    Re: Are the Raiders Done in Oakland?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarcasticfury View Post
    St. Louis does not support the Rams. St. Louis might have one of the quietest dome stadiums in the league. St. Louis is a baseball town. If the Rams moved, no one would care.
    Meh. I went to a game last year. Was filled and not very quiet. Wasnt Indy with their piped in noise but thats the only dome I ca. compare to.





  5. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Mt. Arrogance in the middle of the .11 rolling acres of The Windbag Estates
    Posts
    13,679

    Re: Are the Raiders Done in Oakland?

    Crowd noise is less important than butts in the seats, but even that is less than sold club seats and suites.





  6. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    "Merlin", Hon!
    Posts
    7,952

    Re: Are the Raiders Done in Oakland?

    LA Rams
    LA Chargers
    San Antonio Raiders

    2020 expansion candidate finalists:

    London
    Toronto
    St Louis
    In a 2003 BBC poll that asked Brits to name the "Greatest American Ever", Mr. T came in fourth, behind ML King (3rd), Abe Lincoln (2nd) and Homer Simpson (1st).





  7. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wayne Manor, Gotham
    Posts
    48,853
    Blog Entries
    8

    Re: Are the Raiders Done in Oakland?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarcasticfury View Post
    St. Louis does not support the Rams. St. Louis might have one of the quietest dome stadiums in the league. St. Louis is a baseball town. If the Rams moved, no one would care.
    Their attendance is okay. The real problem is the lack of luxury box support. That's what owners want and St. Louis has proven twice now that they don't have enough of a business base thats want to pay crazy prices for football. They certainly do for baseball and pretty good for NHL hockey but that's just not been the case with football.





Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Link To Mobile Site
var infolinks_pid = 3297965; var infolinks_wsid = 0; //—->