Results 61 to 72 of 175
Thread: Rd. 1 headscratchers
-
05-09-2014, 09:51 AM #61
-
05-09-2014, 09:54 AM #62
Re: Rd. 1 headscratchers
So if he's an All Pro in years 4 and 5, the pick is a waste, huh? If two years from now, DSmith hits the road, and for the next 8 years Brown/Mosley play like Bowman/Willis, that's a waste? If Mosley only becomes very very good, but whatever player you wanted us to take instead (have you told us who that is?) flames out royally and is out of the league after two seasons, then this pick is a waste?
"Chin up, chest out."
-
-
Re: Rd. 1 headscratchers
Most likely for the next 2 years one of Smith and/or Brown will be getting limited snaps because of Mosley.
Had we not drafted Mosley the person getting limited snaps would have been a guy like Bynes. I'd much rather be wasting Bynes talents on the sideline than Brown's or Smith's.
Why have solid talent sitting on the sidelines? Because that is the scenario we face now after drafting Mosley. Brown or Smith is going to effectively be a part time player. That is not why we traded up for Brown just last year in rd 2. That is not why Smith was re-signed.
-
05-09-2014, 10:06 AM #65Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
- Kent Island
- Posts
- 1,096
-
-
05-09-2014, 10:18 AM #67
Re: Rd. 1 headscratchers
What does a weak ILB class have to do with anything? Mosley was rated highly against all players, regardless of position. He wasn't a reach. At worst, he was drafted pretty much right where most had him going.
And, again, good teams don't draft for just this coming season. They draft for the future as well. This has always been the team's mantra, starting in 1996 when Ozzie ignored need (RB, and a whole host of other spots) and picked JO, even though he had two starting quality OTs.
-
05-09-2014, 10:19 AM #68
Re: Rd. 1 headscratchers
So Jimmy Smith in 2011 and Arthur Jones in 2010 are not impact players? I think the Ravens would disagree with you on that one. Also, it's far too early to tell whether or not Elam, Brown and Williams (2013 draftees) will be impact players. Unless you just count the short term (which is short-sighted).
-
05-09-2014, 10:20 AM #69
Re: Rd. 1 headscratchers
-
05-09-2014, 10:21 AM #70Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Posts
- 486
Re: Rd. 1 headscratchers
Bt everything you've said up to this point is pure speculation. The fact is it wasn't a reach for the ravens, whether you choose to believe if he was truly their 10th ranked player or not doesn't matter, he was worth the pick in their eyes. No one truly knows the plans the ravens have for him, or for Arthur brown for that matter. We have a solid veteran and two young inside linebackers with huge upside for the future. How the snaps will be distributed will be decided by harbaugh but all three will most likely significant playing time. Our defense just got better, not to mention there are still very prospects on the board for the ravens to take. If you don't like the pick, that's fine but come up with a better reason than what you think the team will do. You still haven't stated who you think the ravens should have taken or done in that scenario.
-
05-09-2014, 10:22 AM #71
Re: Rd. 1 headscratchers
-
05-09-2014, 10:25 AM #72
Re: Rd. 1 headscratchers
Bookmarks