Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 61 to 72 of 82
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Middle River
    Posts
    8,858
    Blog Entries
    9

    Re: Cost to move up to #10 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenswintitle View Post
    TY

    That chart uses Jimmy Johnson's old values which puts a high premium on early picks and a low value on later ones
    First pick is worth 3000, last pick is worth 0.4
    The Harvard Sports Analysis Collective did an analysis and came up with their own chart values
    http://harvardsportsanalysis.wordpre...l-draft-picks/

    But as an old auctioneer from Boring Md once told me, you want to know the real value? Put it in an auction, what it sells for is what it is worth. Picks are worth what you can get for them .... someone wants somebody bad enough they pay.
    at one point of my life I was exactly Pi years old





  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Cockeysville, MD
    Posts
    22,249
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Cost to move up to #10 ?

    I don't see it happening, no matter the cost. Ozzie covets picks. If I were a betting man I would wager he trades back rather than stand pat or trade up, especially since this is supposedly a deep draft. I for one would rather he trade up and grab a game changer for once. We haven't drafted a player who keeps other coordinators up at night since Rice in '08.





  3. #63
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    37,662
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Cost to move up to #10 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenswintitle View Post
    Not sure if this is appropriate. I typed my sister-in-law in as pick #1, with a trade down, and came up with "0.00" every time. That's not fair... Bc





  4. #64

    Re: Cost to move up to #10 ?

    The mantra - "Ozzie covets picks!" Too bad he's not better at selecting players. Look at the track record - Ozzie is not the wizard that people maintain he is. He is no better or no worse than most of the other GMs in the league - except for maybe the Browns and a couple of other bottom dwellers.



    Quote Originally Posted by Terpsfan82 View Post
    I don't see it happening, no matter the cost. Ozzie covets picks. If I were a betting man I would wager he trades back rather than stand pat or trade up, especially since this is supposedly a deep draft. I for one would rather he trade up and grab a game changer for once. We haven't drafted a player who keeps other coordinators up at night since Rice in '08.





  5. #65

    Re: Cost to move up to #10 ?

    At last - someone who understands reality and the Ravens. The 17th pick and Ray Rice for Evans would be a steal.

    Quote Originally Posted by Money227 View Post
    Yes...I would trade Ray Rice and our 1st to move up in a heartbeat ;)





  6. #66
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Northern Ireland, UK
    Posts
    7,186

    Re: Cost to move up to #10 ?

    As long as its not for evans.





  7. #67

    Re: Cost to move up to #10 ?

    I think the Jimmy Johnson chart is a bit obsolete, which is why the trade values have seemed less balanced more often in the recent years than the past. In general, I think the curve is thought to be a bit flatter now, with the 2nd and 3rd round picks gaining a bit more value while the top end of the first round losing a bit of value from Johnson's chart. I don't see much evidence there has been a gain of perceived value for the later round picks.

    But the Harvard analysis is still worse (than Johnson's chart), imo.

    For one thing it is entirely predicated on PFR's wildly subjective CAV numbers (for non-skill positions the 'numbers' are nearly worthless, imo).

    But most importantly, it does not in any way address the fact that the ultimate goal of NFL GMs is to maximize the utility of the limited group of players that see the field not maximize some metric of combined CAV's. Raising the quality of a benchwarmer by some amount while reducing the quality of your starter by a lesser amount can easily be a net loss to your team's performance, even if it is a net gain to aggregate team CAV. Likewise, trading the #1 overall pick for all 32 seventh round picks looks great according to the Harvard chart, but in reality is a terrible move.

    Anyway, as Rxdoxx said, the 'value' of each pick is what someone will 'pay' for it. And it will vary depending on the circumstance.
    Last edited by Haloti92; 05-05-2014 at 03:52 PM.





  8. #68
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Centreville, MD
    Posts
    5,299

    Re: Cost to move up to #10 ?

    Too high of a cost. Stay where you are and trust your scouting process.
    Never get in a fight with a pig; you both get muddy, and the pig likes it...






  9. #69
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Posts
    11,154

    Re: Cost to move up to #10 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Loyola View Post
    At last - someone who understands reality and the Ravens. The 17th pick and Ray Rice for Evans would be a steal.
    I assume you're in on this as a joke, right? I didn't see a smiley-face.
    "Chin up, chest out."





  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    37,662
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Cost to move up to #10 ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Loyola View Post
    The mantra - "Ozzie covets picks!" Too bad he's not better at selecting players. Look at the track record - Ozzie is not the wizard that people maintain he is. He is no better or no worse than most of the other GMs in the league - except for maybe the Browns and a couple of other bottom dwellers.
    Oh I wholeheartedly agree! Woe are us Ravens fans who only have TWO Super Bowl Championships in 18 years. Why can't we have at least 10 like ???????????????????? ... Bc





  11. #71

    Re: Cost to move up to #10 ?

    I saw the Smiley Face and I WOULD trade the #1 and Rice for Evans in a heartbeat.

    The Ravens went off the deep end on Rice - giving him the contract they gave him. Rice's best days are behind him. The Ravens were lucky to get 6 years out of Rice (and that's if you consider last year's production anything but a joke).



    Quote Originally Posted by HotInHere View Post
    I assume you're in on this as a joke, right? I didn't see a smiley-face.





  12. #72
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    UK 🇬🇧
    Posts
    16,734
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Loyola View Post
    I saw the Smiley Face and I WOULD trade the #1 and Rice for Evans in a heartbeat.

    The Ravens went off the deep end on Rice - giving him the contract they gave him. Rice's best days are behind him. The Ravens were lucky to get 6 years out of Rice (and that's if you consider last year's production anything but a joke).
    You can't trade Rice without huge cap implications.





Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Link To Mobile Site
var infolinks_pid = 3297965; var infolinks_wsid = 0; //—->