Results 49 to 60 of 334
-
04-29-2014, 09:10 PM #49
Re: Would the NFL Ban an Owner for Life?
From my understanding the NBA Owner's Constitution Chapter 13 states "The Membership of a Member or the interest of any Owner may be terminated by a vote of three fourths (3/4) of the Board of Governors if the Member or Owner shall do or suffer any of the following: (a) Willfully violate any of the provisions of the Constitution and By-Laws, resolutions, or agreements of the Association."
A provision that would fall under that rule is in Chapter 35A, which states "Any person who gives, makes, issues, authorizes or endorses any statement having, or designed to have, an effect
prejudicial or detrimental to the best interests of basketball or of the Association or of a Member or its Team"
Sterling's comments definitely have had a detrimental impact to his team and the league. This is a contract and Constitution he willing entered into when he became an owner. Legally speaking he doesn't have a leg to stand on.Master of 'Gifs for dummies'
"The world called for wetwork, and we answered. No greater good. No just cause." - Kazuhira Miller
-
04-29-2014, 09:11 PM #50
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Greensboro, North Carolina
- Posts
- 10,031
- Blog Entries
- 3
Re: Would the NFL Ban an Owner for Life?
I agree that it is a little extreme, especially given the fact that he didnt even drop a racial slur. But the NBA didnt really have a choice. 95% of the players are black and you had guys threatening to not show up. The NBA could have lost a lot of money if guys staged a protest. It sucks for him.
I do know that this chick is now the most expensive piece of ass in the history of mankind. And she looks like a man. My question for Sterling is, was it worth it?
-
04-29-2014, 09:12 PM #51
Re: Would the NFL Ban an Owner for Life?
There could be many variables to why he said something like that but it certainly doesn't make a lot of sense....I find it more than a little strange that a man who employs mostly AA and most of the games followers are AA would say something like that and mean it for all AA's....
I always say, a one sided story is real convincing, until you hear the other side.
-
04-29-2014, 09:17 PM #52
Re: Would the NFL Ban an Owner for Life?
A private conversation that was made public. I am open to criticism about the way it was revealed...but once it made it's way into the public arena, all bets were off.
For example, if your employer said privately that he hated you for no logical reason, and that he didn't want you attending company sponsor events, and said derogatory statements about your heritage. Now those comments were made public. Would you be opposed to your employer being ousted?Master of 'Gifs for dummies'
"The world called for wetwork, and we answered. No greater good. No just cause." - Kazuhira Miller
-
04-29-2014, 09:20 PM #53
Re: Would the NFL Ban an Owner for Life?
Master of 'Gifs for dummies'
"The world called for wetwork, and we answered. No greater good. No just cause." - Kazuhira Miller
-
04-29-2014, 09:27 PM #54Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 544
-
Re: Would the NFL Ban an Owner for Life?
What about the Orlando owner and his hatred for gays. He's given a lot of money to fight gay rights and fund organizations. Where does it end?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
World Domination 3 Points at a Time!
-
04-29-2014, 09:32 PM #56
Re: Would the NFL Ban an Owner for Life?
Maybe, but we still haven't heard his side of the story and as someone pointed out, he didn't even use a racial slur....And if he had so many other violations , why didn't they punish him then instead of unloading on him now over something so questionable ?
I'm not an NBA fan so I wouldn't know about his past, only the news of the situation at hand.
And this looks very unfair and questionable to me as an unbiased observer.
-
Re: Would the NFL Ban an Owner for Life?
Donald Sterling is worth $2 billion...taking away his livelihood? Lmao. He's bought that team for $12 million and is liable to get $800+ million via any sale.
The guy has a long a storied history of being a racist and a bigot...this wasn't in any way an isolated case.
I don't buy the second chance BS because of his documented history...he has had many, many chances, and if I hear one more idiot on the radio or on twitter bring up the first amendment I'm going to lose it.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HDAlthough Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.
-
04-29-2014, 09:35 PM #58Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Houston, TX Y'all
- Posts
- 34,414
Re: Would the NFL Ban an Owner for Life?
This is a business decision, not a legal one.
Concepts such as privacy, "fruit from a poison tree", etc do not apply here.
The NBA has by laws in place, which Sterling agreed upon prior to his membership in the league, and he can be removed.
He also agreed that all disputes will be arbitrated so there's no avenue via the courts in which he can seek remedy.
In short, he's fucked.
-
04-29-2014, 09:37 PM #59
Re: Would the NFL Ban an Owner for Life?
Yes I do.
http://mediacentral.nba.com/media/me...nd-By-Laws.pdf
The comments were made in private but are now public. There is no legal privilege about comments made between a man and his mistress (i.e. spousal privilege). Also he is not being prosecuted by the government for his comments. This is a private organization exercising its by-laws on a member.
What actually do you think he should take the NBA to court over, being (possible, more than likely) forced to sell his team, lifetime ban from operating team, or the 2.5 mil fine? All of these punishments Sterling agreed to when he became an owner and signed the Constitution.Master of 'Gifs for dummies'
"The world called for wetwork, and we answered. No greater good. No just cause." - Kazuhira Miller
-
Re: Would the NFL Ban an Owner for Life?
Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.
Bookmarks