Results 13 to 24 of 24
Thread: Webb ...restructure deal?
-
01-03-2014, 12:11 PM #13
Re: Webb ...restructure deal?
Yes, Mike Preston suggested that this was a possibility in an article on Wednesday:
http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/r...,7614435.story
The basics are:
Brian McFarland @RavensSalaryCap 2 Jan
Restructuring LWebb's contract -> a simple restructure would create over $5M in '14 Cap space, but would add $1.7M onto his 15,16&17 Cap #'s
Webb makes sense because he is still young and has 4 years left on his deal. Doing one of these at a time, with a couple of years spread between them, isn't going to put the team in Cap jail or make them anything like the Steelers or Cowboys. Those teams did wholesale restructures with multiple players on the roster and then did it all over again the next year. That's what gets you in Cap hell.
-
01-03-2014, 12:20 PM #14Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- New York City
- Posts
- 37,667
- Blog Entries
- 4
Re: Webb ...restructure deal?
Thing about "Cap Hell" is that if your team won because of it, then it was worth it. Teams like the Redskins, who overpay but don't win, have not used their CH wisely. The Ravens OTOH were one catch away from the Super Bowl (2011) and follow that season up with a Championship (2012). IMO the ravens have used their CH sensibly... Bc
-
01-03-2014, 12:36 PM #15
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Greensboro, North Carolina
- Posts
- 10,031
- Blog Entries
- 3
-
01-03-2014, 12:41 PM #16Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Posts
- 805
Re: Webb ...restructure deal?
I would prefer not to restructure his contract. Right now it seems like Jimmy could be our #1 CB of the future and that Webb could get released after like 2 more seasons. Not saying this will happen, but it's not unlikely, and that's a situation we can prepare for by not restructuring him.
If Suggs is released, I don't think we have huge salary cap issues in 2014, at least that's my impression.
-
01-03-2014, 01:19 PM #17
-
01-03-2014, 11:36 PM #18
Re: Webb ...restructure deal?
I think the concept of Webb restructuring is a fallback if they can't get an extension with Suggs or decide to let him play under the final year of his deal.
The $5M from Webb would go a long way toward replacing the $7.8M savings from releasing Suggs or whatever amount they would save with an extension.
The "leaking" of this info (Preston, for all of his faults, has been know to carry the water for the organization in the past) could also be an attempt to create leverage with Suggs, ie, we'd like to reach an extension, but we have other options if you won't play ball.
-
Re: Webb ...restructure deal?
I love Webbie, but no way would I restructure his deal.
His "reckless" play by throwing his body around and his injury history scare me long term.
He plays like a guy who whose body will betray him earlier than anticipated.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HDAlthough Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.
-
01-04-2014, 11:00 AM #20Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 1,708
Re: Webb ...restructure deal?
I don't mind this deal as Webb has plenty more years left. It was clear he didn't fully trust his knee this year and I'm hoping with another offseason of rest and recovery, he'll be back to early 2012 form.
-
Re: Webb ...restructure deal?
-
01-04-2014, 11:40 AM #22
Re: Webb ...restructure deal?
Sure, why not. His restructure will not add materially to future years' cap issues. He's a guy who played decent during his first year back from an ACL. He's be stronger next year, and he's still young.
Suggs on the other hand, I would need to be convinced that he's going to produce. He looked like a liability during the second half of the season.
WORLD CHAMPIONS 2000 * 2012
-
01-05-2014, 03:02 AM #23On The Practice Squad
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Posts
- 79
Re: Webb ...restructure deal?
We're no where near cap hell. Cap hell is having to cut or restructure players to get under the cap when you only have a little over 40 players signed like the Cowboys, Steelers, and Saints.
Don't touch Webb's contract, it's one of the few big contract that doesn't get more bloated as it goes on and we can get out of for actual savings if it doesn't work out.
-
01-05-2014, 02:59 PM #24
Re: Webb ...restructure deal?
Originally Posted by kronusthebonus
Bookmarks