Results 265 to 276 of 3005
Thread: The 2014 Ravens Draft Thread
-
Re: The Case for a Defense-heavy Draft
Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.
-
01-06-2014, 03:34 PM #266Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Posts
- 6,040
Re: The Case for a Defense-heavy Draft
Tuitt is basically the only defensive prospect I'd take at #16 other than Barr/Clowney/Mack, he is definitely an animal. Schematically, other than miscommunications in the secondary, lack of interior pass rush was the Ravens' biggest defensive weakness this past year. Tuitt would definitely add some interior pass rush.
Me personally, and I have been saying this for a while now, the Ravens need to use less vanilla 3-4 looks. They have so many big, fat run pluggers on the DL that are really good fits for the 3-4, but those guys don't get you any penetration on the inside and they're sucking wind by the 3rd quarter. If they would commit to more 4 man fronts they could rotate Ngata and B. Williams at one DT spot and pair him up with a quick, undersized gap-shooting type of guy.
Geno Atkins was exactly that kind of player coming out of Georgia and he fell to the late 4th because he was only 6'1 290lbs. Who could be the next Geno Atkins? Calvin Barnett is a guy I love to be that sort of player in the middle rounds.
-
01-06-2014, 03:47 PM #267
Re: The Case for a Defense-heavy Draft
Cuz I was bored...Watt played two years at Wisconsin, so only looked at Tuitt's final two seasons.
(Solo / Asst / Total / TFL / Sacks)
Watt: 74 / 31 / 105 / 36 / 11.5 -- 4 FR
Tuitt: 46 / 48 / 94 / 20 / 18.5 -- 4 FF
Scheme and surround talent matters for context. Schedule does too. For example, ND faced (essentially, non-passing) Navy and Air Force 3 times in 2012 and 2013. Both with much smaller OL that he no doubt dominated, yet presented very, very few sack opportunities.
Had no idea that Tuitt was 6'5/6'6. Might grab a top ten spot as a Combine Commando.Last edited by BigPlayReceiver; 01-06-2014 at 03:58 PM. Reason: Sumtyms I dont spel to gud
"The Ravens are not taking Jimmy Smith at 26!" -- Me, the day before the 2011 Draft
"On their way to the podium, the Ravens FO is going to collectively step over my dead body and select...Breshad Perriman." -- Me, the day before the 2015 Draft
Missed it by That Much: The story of 'Get Smart' and the modern day Baltimore Ravens
@BigPlayReceiver
-
01-06-2014, 03:52 PM #268
Re: The Case for a Defense-heavy Draft
At 6'1 300, Arizona State's Will Sutton has 111 total tackles, 37 TFL and 16 sacks in his last two seasons.
Believe it or not, that includes a rather dramatic drop in his TFL and sack numbers for 2013.
Went crazy in 2012, and became a marked man for double-teams in 2013."The Ravens are not taking Jimmy Smith at 26!" -- Me, the day before the 2011 Draft
"On their way to the podium, the Ravens FO is going to collectively step over my dead body and select...Breshad Perriman." -- Me, the day before the 2015 Draft
Missed it by That Much: The story of 'Get Smart' and the modern day Baltimore Ravens
@BigPlayReceiver
-
01-06-2014, 03:53 PM #269Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
- Posts
- 1,362
Re: The Case for a Defense-heavy Draft
Totally agree. Just not a big fan of using high picks on safeties unless they are truly exceptional, Ed Reed type exceptional. I'll probably get laughed at for this, but if Corey Graham was still under contract I'd like to try him at FS, though I guess the point is moot now.
However, if the Ravens want him back and can get him for less than starting corner money, I'd advocate this move, alone probably. But it seems like effective use of resources if one favors this type of outside the box thinking. Then rather than draft a safety, maybe we go for a corner like Kyle Fuller in the 3rd or 4th. Or maybe just see what Asa Jackson can do, with Omar Brown backing up FS. Graham is still only 29.
Then we could put Elam at SS where he belongs and solve the Ihedigbo dilemma. I liked James for his physicality on a defense that lost a lot of that. There were even a couple of games where I thought he was the Raven's best defender. Of course, there were also some games where he was not so good. Nevertheless, eventually it became clear that he was just blocking Elam.
I probably yell at Graham more than any other Ravens defender during a game, but it's not because I think he's a bad player. I just get frustrated with how he plays corner. Too much cushion, gets rubbed and loses his man too much. Seems confused at times.
I watch him and I see a FS playing corner. He has good ball skills, good hands, tracks it well. It's his man he has trouble tracking. Even with his weaknesses, he's done some good things here, 65 tackles (I know a lot of them were of his own man after an easy catch), 3 picks and a FF as the 3rd corner in 2013. 74 tackles (insert same joke here), 4 picks, a sack and a FF in 2012.
Who can forget the playoffs vs Denver? 2 picks, one for a TD and the other setting up Tucker's game winner in OT. After Joe, he was right there with Jacoby as the MVP runner up in that game. Where would the Ravens have been without him in 2012 after Webb went down? It just feels like most people are coloring him gone, and many think good riddance. Now whether or not we can afford him is a different question. Probably would take a surprise cut/restructure, like Suggs.
I watch Corey and his game just screams centerfielder to me. No man to worry about losing. Can just play the ball and provide over the top help, which fits what he does best. Pretty good speed and a decent enough tackler. Not saying he'd be all pro, but I do think he could be above average. And he could still be an emergency corner.
I know the Bears were very close to putting him there a couple times, but I guess that fizzled out and he hit free agency. Anyway, this is silly I guess. Probably a waste of time for anyone reading this, but I've always felt this way and I guess this was just my chance to get it out.Last edited by Igotstoknow; 01-06-2014 at 05:18 PM.
-
01-06-2014, 04:15 PM #270
Re: The Case for a Defense-heavy Draft
From this article by Mink
http://www.baltimoreravens.com/news/...tm_source=t.co
The other reason, Harbaugh said, was that opponents adjusted to the Ravens’ hot start and began getting the ball out quicker to avoid taking sacks. That made Baltimore start playing more coverage. The Ravens relied more on their secondary.
Harbaugh pointed to the final game in Cincinnati as an example of how the game plan changed.
“In the Cincinnati game, we played more coverage – which [Defensive Coordinator] Dean [Pees] knows I’m not a big fan of,” Harbaugh said. “I like blitzing. To me, we’re a blitzing team, we’re a pressure team.
“Yet, we get four interceptions, because [Dalton’s] getting the ball out fast, and our guys are playing coverage, and we’re doubling certain guys, and we’re changing up our coverage patterns back there. I thought our guys did a good job with that.”
Still, Harbaugh said the Ravens need to find a way to maintain their strong pass rush no matter what opponents are doing to counteract it.
“We’ve got to make sure we can do that throughout the course of the season and keep hitting quarterbacks, because if you do that, you’re going to be successful,” he said."The Ravens are not taking Jimmy Smith at 26!" -- Me, the day before the 2011 Draft
"On their way to the podium, the Ravens FO is going to collectively step over my dead body and select...Breshad Perriman." -- Me, the day before the 2015 Draft
Missed it by That Much: The story of 'Get Smart' and the modern day Baltimore Ravens
@BigPlayReceiver
-
-
Re: The Case for a Defense-heavy Draft
-
Re: The Case for a Defense-heavy Draft
I'm taking Tuitt over all of those needs. He is flat out the better prospect than most guys that would be there at those positions, save Sammy Watkins, and possibly Taylor Lewan (very unlikely to fall) and Jake Matthews (more than unlikely).
Would you take Haha, Marquise Lee, Travis Swanson, or CK over Tuitt at 16?
Forget about holes, this team needs play makers and impact players in the draft. One of the reasons we went 8-8 is because our guys are declining (Rice, Suggs etc) we need to just get flat out play makers to improve this team.
-
Re: The Case for a Defense-heavy Draft
-
01-06-2014, 04:34 PM #275
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- Where Ravens Fans Roam Free
- Posts
- 9,277
- Blog Entries
- 1
Re: The Case for a Defense-heavy Draft
I would take Marquise Lee over Truitt at 16/17. The Ravens need to improve the offense. I would not be at all surprised if Ozzie took a defensive player in the first round though. He seems to have a lot more confidence of being able to hit on defensive players as opposed to offensive players.
-
Re: The Case for a Defense-heavy Draft
I'd have a hard time ever stomach Clark in purple. I do totally agree with you about the FS position in this draft. It's not good. Last year was probably the best S draft class in NFL history with guys like Reid, Elam, Vacarro, Swearinger, Cyprien, S. Thomas, Rambo, and McDonald. I hate to toot my own horn, but I had us drafting both Elam and Rambo in our draft. I would have loved to see us develop two at the same time. Even when Rambo slid down the charts, the Ravens opted to draft Use-check ahead of him, which was puzzling for a team that seems willing to double dip if the value is there.
I think the Ravens getting ZILCHO out of Christian Thompson is going to set that position back a year or two sadly.
Bookmarks