Results 121 to 132 of 182
-
Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?
Disclaimer: The content posted is of my own opinion.
-
11-25-2013, 10:26 AM #122
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- The Land of Verdite
- Posts
- 53,012
- Blog Entries
- 1
Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?
So, they can barely come up with more creative ways to scheme the players that they already have on the field open, and now they are going six plays out of there way to pull someone off the bench and get him good opportunities? I think we've seen enough of Tyrod Taylor for a season.
"Please take with you this final sword, The Excellector. I am praying that your journey will be guided by the light", Leon Shore
-
11-25-2013, 10:27 AM #123
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- The Land of Verdite
- Posts
- 53,012
- Blog Entries
- 1
Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?
"Please take with you this final sword, The Excellector. I am praying that your journey will be guided by the light", Leon Shore
-
Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?
When you run it once or twice and get good gains out of it, then that is a success. It should be noted as a success and considered a small victory in the overarching battle.
Running the same types of plays out of the same, or similar, formations against any defense is just ridiculous. Those few gains that were had are now completely negated by minimal gains, no gains and losses.
I mean, the plays where Joe splits out wide he is literally just standing there watching the play. He wasn't even covered. When that happens, your offense is basically 10 men vs 11 men.Disclaimer: The content posted is of my own opinion.
-
11-25-2013, 10:50 AM #125Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- NoVa
- Posts
- 520
Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?
-
-
11-25-2013, 11:13 AM #127Pro Bowl Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 1,387
Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?
The stupidity of the play calling is OVERWHELMING.
The first thing they should be concerned with is putting an O line on the field that can run block and MORE IMPORTANTLY pass block.
The second thing should be benching Ray Rice - he's done - put a fork in him.
The third thing is get Joe a TIGHT END - somebody who can catch the ball. Dickson is Dickson and belongs on the inactive list
Start calling plays that make the most of his talents. Putting him in third and long because you run two stupid Tyrod Taylor plays is just plain STUPID
-
-
Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?
I do not blame him... its ridiculous to pay your SB MVP QB to play WR so that your backup QB can run around behind the line before getting sacked for -5. I just dont see Tyrod as such a great athlete/weapon that we need to find ways to get him on the field. getting Flacco out of Rhythm when were struggling to get into it to begin with should be enough to scrap it.
-JAB
-
-
11-25-2013, 11:34 AM #131Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 8,743
Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?
-
11-25-2013, 11:51 AM #132Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 4,464
Bookmarks