Page 7 of 13 FirstFirst ... 34567891011 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 182
  1. #91
    iggyman555 Guest

    Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?



    said many for 3/4 years before

    mb they will get rid of castillo in 3-4 years
    Last edited by iggyman555; 11-21-2013 at 07:47 PM.




  2. #92

    Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?

    Quote Originally Posted by steelerhater View Post
    Well, I said that neither was going to change. Do you really think they're going to all of a sudden drop the zone blocking scheme now? That's Castillo's baby and he isn't going anywhere.
    Read the memo... They already dropped castillos system and are back to a more man system. Which is why the line has been muxh improved the last 2-3 weeks. I wouldnt say its the same as last year but its not the same as earlier either. More of a hybrid which may be the best they do this year at this point. The castillo gamble failed.

    Ill say this. It appears theres a fraction that thinks the OC should create plays for tyrod because hes an athlete. There seems to be another group that says tyrod isnt one of the better athletes so why "create" a playbook for him when we cant "create" plays for the guys that are clearly better at their positions as ot is. You go down the list, hes not a better qb, rb or wr, just because hes on the list for each doesnt mean hes an exceptional talent, it means hes a jack of all trades... Master of none.
    -JAB




  3. #93

    Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?

    Same old already-addressed arguments.

    Some people are protesting too much. I wonder why?




  4. #94
    iggyman555 Guest

    Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?

    check out that bootleg brees ran before the 2 minute warning at the end of the game. our coaches would never design anything like that when trying to close the game




  5. #95
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    over by the dental floss bush
    Posts
    17,949
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?

    Glad the coaches are working him in for more plays. It's the right call IMO
    World Domination 3 Points at a Time!




  6. #96

    Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?

    Enough is enough, how stupid do they think Rex is.




  7. #97
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern PA
    Posts
    5,056
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?

    Quote Originally Posted by JoeWedra View Post
    In my personal opinion, I'd like to see Tyrod more often!!

    Thoughts??
    NOT like we saw today against the Jets!!




  8. #98
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    31,880
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?

    Milk is for babies. When you grow up, you have to drink beer.

    -Arnold Schwarzenegger



    Check out Fatherhood Rules - a blog site dedicated to sports, food, music, movies, and politics.
    http://fatherhoodrules.com




  9. #99
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Venice Florida
    Posts
    273

    Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?

    We won today. You tell me.




  10. #100
    iggyman555 Guest

    Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?

    Quote Originally Posted by Florida Art View Post
    We won today. You tell me.


    however i would reduce his snaps by a few




  11. #101
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Eastern Shore
    Posts
    2,559

    Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?

    Quote Originally Posted by 4G63 View Post
    NOT like we saw today against the Jets!!
    Exactly. I think it works if they use him OCCASIONALLY. He can help in the run game but it becomes too predictable if they use him too much.
    "Screw it, let's ride"!




  12. #102
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    over by the dental floss bush
    Posts
    17,949
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?

    those end arounds did not fool anyone. But otherwise he did have the longest run of the game by a good stretch
    World Domination 3 Points at a Time!




  13. #103
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    2,365
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?

    Was good to see it a little bit, but I think we got too cute and used him a little too much. No way it should have been used for two plays in a row. And it seemed to mess up the rhythm at times.
    "What would you give for the man beside you?"




  14. #104
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Wilmington, North Carolina
    Posts
    3,294
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?

    Like anything new or different, it was a mixed bag. I said earlier in the thread, I would hope we could use Deonte on that "end around" look (whether we run it or fake it to him).

    But the fact is, Taylor can help you get a 1st down here and there, and that's what it's all about.

    Was it as seamless as we'd like to see? No. You could see they were feeling their way around this new wrinkle. Some of the plays didn't need to be called. But overall, this is a welcome development.

    Dickson, as usual, should have caught TT's pass....




  15. #105

    Re: Should Tyrod Taylor be included more often?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayc00 View Post
    Was good to see it a little bit, but I think we got too cute and used him a little too much. No way it should have been used for two plays in a row. And it seemed to mess up the rhythm at times.
    This^^^.

    A bit forced after the first big play. And too many plays total.

    The two option-reads where Tyrod handed it when he could have run it, and then when we immediately repeated the play he kept it and got stuffed, were a bridge too far, imo.

    As was the pitch. We should try counter pitches with Flacco though. But the option pitch didn't fool them at all (with Tyrod), there was no legitimate threat to run, it was an obvious pitch and the pitch was behind Rice (the execution needs to be worked on).

    I did think the quick-hitter to Dickson was open and fooled them, only Tyrod gunned it too low and Dickson did not make the harder-than-it-should-have-been grab.

    I do like Tyrod on some of the short 3rd downs. Certainly better than running Rice for 0, and probably also higher percentage than our rudimentary pass plays on 3rd and 2 as well.




Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russell Street Report Website Design by D3Corp Ocean City Maryland