Results 13 to 24 of 60
Thread: Chris Christie
-
Re: Chris Christie
Because you get someone like Obama, who isn't really moderate at all. IMO, he is to the Democratic party as Ted Cruz is to the Republican Party.
Originally Posted by NCRAVEN
Originally Posted by NCRAVEN
Unlike Mitt, Christie knows how to run a campaign.
Originally Posted by NCRAVENDisclaimer: The content posted is of my own opinion.
-
Re: Chris Christie
i find it funny that the republicans (Bush) are getting labeled as bipartisan. The last bipartisan president we had was Clinton and half the shit he gets blamed for was republican ideas that he supported. I wish i could remember the book or at least the author, but there was one by a republican official of some sorts that basically outlined their entire strategy for a democratic president. In short, stop them from doing anything. Its better to look incompetent than let them get what they want. Thats where were at, almost to a Tee. You can say the left is trying to just get everything they want, but you cant say the right is innocent on why its like that right now because they arent trying to work together, theyre trying to stop it entirely. their way of working together is trying to get what they want or nothing.
everyones quick to point out problems with ACA, but when they went to work on it did they? no, they just voted to repeal it completely. 50 times. its a joke, and both sides are the punchline and the citizens are the butt of it.Last edited by JAB1985; 11-12-2013 at 01:38 PM.
-JAB
-
Re: Chris Christie
In all fairness, Obama and the Senate Dems didn't really want to try and work on the ACA at all. Thus why they passed it the way that they did.
I think had they actually looked at trying to work something out where both parties had input on it, then they wouldn't have had to get the law passed like they did. Additionally, I think that would have made the Republicans had no ground to stand on for trying to repeal it.Disclaimer: The content posted is of my own opinion.
-
Re: Chris Christie
The republicans never wanted to work on it either. Show me where there was a republican speaking for ACA where they wanted it but just needed to fix a few things... I dont think that ever was the case. If it was, it probably was to pass the law and work on it, which never followed through with.
thats pretty much my point, both sides only want their way and that goes back for a long time. Its a two way street, not a democrat problem.-JAB
-
-
11-12-2013, 02:02 PM #18Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Posts
- 4,553
Re: Chris Christie
Almost all the credit Clinton gets was Republican ideas or him compromising towards Republican positions, I am not sure what you are talking about getting "blamed for." Certainly not balancing the budget (or almost), or welfare reform.
And Obama attempting to compromise? Seriously? There is no evidence whatsoever that is the case and plenty of evidence it is pure nonsense. You have to separate politically motivated lies and empty pleas for comity from the administration's actions. The former exist, because they fool some people (obviously), but the latter inevitably put the lie to the former.
-
Re: Chris Christie
Thanks Solo. Great thread and I'm with HR. I often am.
The GOP is so fractured nobody can win especially if Hilly runs and she will. Like I said, Tea Partiers will stay home if Christie proves to be a RINO and then the libbies will stay home if Cruz wins. That's fractured.
Your right too saying Christie cares more about his people. That's what the guv is suppose to be. His people come first and damn with the party but not all politicians are that way.
And speaking of Mitt running a bad campaign, he was scared to death to mention LIbya in the debates for turning independents vs him just like McCain was scared to bring up Jeremiah Wrong for being called a racist.
OBY won both elections playing the race card.
As for Christie not being like MItt, again, he only wins
if the TEa Party supports him. If they see him as another
Rino they will go home.
And one last point on Mitt running a campaign, OBY did too. It was his worse but he was the incumbent and he always wins except in a couple of cases like Carter and the other Rino H. Bush.
Don't forget, Rove saw this and begged Christie to run but he wasn't ready yet.
And while he loves his people, he over did it with that hug during Sandy. He went too far.
Rush was right. Conservatives are still in the majority of the country. OBY just got by with the Spanish and white female vote with 30M or so conservative Christians staying home once again. Just a fraction of those conservatives win both elections. It's the only way the DEMs can win.
One last interesting point about those female votes he got, they are now turning vs him because 50M people just lost their health plans after their companies dropping them because it was so expensive. One lady was crying on TV saying she had cancer and couldn't pay. JonBoy and I said a hundred times in here that was going to happen.
Their website cost $500,000 and by a company that gave OBY a lot of money for his campaign. Both their website and O BUMMER CARE are a train wreck.
The very women that voted for him because of it are losing their plans.
We told you so bitch.Last edited by AirFlacco; 11-12-2013 at 03:04 PM.
-
11-12-2013, 04:49 PM #20Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Houston, TX Y'all
- Posts
- 34,414
Re: Chris Christie
If this poll is accurate, Christie isn't too popular outside of NJ ….
http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2...etical-16-race
-
11-12-2013, 05:01 PM #21Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Posts
- 4,553
Re: Chris Christie
He wouldn't even win New Jersey against Clinton. She polled better than him in the exit polls conducted in his most recent landslide win. And that election was engineered to keep Democratic turnout low (by scheduling the Booker special election earlier).
Christie would be better for the country than Clinton, imo, but that isn't saying much.
I think it is safe to say that barring something very unexpected, Clinton is a lock to win in 2016. Though the Obamacare debacle increasing, combined with a Republican candidate no one is thinking about right now, just might change the outlook.
-
Re: Chris Christie
O'Reilly asked if O'BUMMER CARE would be done away with and the analyst said no. It's the law but it's falling under it's under weight, just like the old USSR.
It could be a bogus law.
Maybe Roberts knew what he was doing afterall. He knew it would fail with history looking on him favorably as being fair to all.
-
Re: Chris Christie
As for Slick Willie and the GOP, it was Dick Morris, his advisor and guy who got him elected said to go along with the GOPs and balance the budget. You'll get the credit for it and he was sure right.
History gives him the credit while Newt and his boys put the screws on him to balance the budge. Most DEMs don't even know that or want to.
-
Re: Chris Christie
One of the things that politicians never considered was that most laws are statutes by which constituents are supposed to adhere to.
The ACA law is attempting to provide an actual service or deliverable to the American people. Laws just aren't supposed to be that way.
Also, the entire roll out is an epic steaming hot pile of FAIL on so many levels.
I think the only way that the ACA can actually work is if the entire thing is state run and offered/funded through the state. That way states could have their own referendum and allow the citizens of each state to truly determine if they want a socialized healthcare option, they can be a part of the ACA and abide by ACA guidelines.
The United States is just far too big and far too diverse for something like a centralized and federally run healthcare program to work.Disclaimer: The content posted is of my own opinion.
Bookmarks