Results 1 to 12 of 18
Thread: Depth
Hybrid View
-
08-15-2013, 11:11 PM #1
Depth
I've never seen anything like it on a Ravens' team. There's a reason teams have a 53-man roster. We will find the #2 WR. That's truly the only question mark.
Ozzie truly is a genius.
BTW...the Daryl Smith signing to replace #52 is actually beyond genius.
-
08-15-2013, 11:14 PM #2On The Practice Squad
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 76
Re: Depth
I have to agree with the Darryl Smith signing. He has looked awesome. We just need him to stay healthy. I think that was an issue he had at J-Ville
-
08-15-2013, 11:16 PM #3Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 488
Re: Depth
depth...we have it.
-
08-15-2013, 11:17 PM #4On The Practice Squad
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 76
Re: Depth
IF Ozzie is not the smartest GM I don't know who is. This guy is brilliant
-
Re: Depth
If Smith can stay healthy he is one of the best
World Domination 3 Points at a Time!
-
08-15-2013, 11:33 PM #6
Re: Depth
Smith only missed a few games before last year. If we still had Ellerbe, that would be a concern.
-
08-15-2013, 11:39 PM #7iggyman555 Guest
Re: Depth
we are reallly really realy deep
-
Re: Depth
Phil Savage tweeted this last night:
"Last 5 SB winners and 7 of last 10 have won at least 2 preseason games. 46/60 playoff teams since '08 won 2+ (77%)"
Now, those could just be coincidental numbers, or they could have some meaning.
To me, this shows the depth of a team, because the majority of preseason games are played out by the #2/3's.
So, it shows that during the course of a season, you need depth. I absolutely believe this is a large part of our success. Can teams get by having superior 1st string talent? Sure. And if they get lucky and don't suffer any major injuries they can probably do quite well. But when injury hits, and the replacements come in, how will you survive? Last year, even in a down year defensively, we were able to effectively cover for the loss of Suggs, Webb and Ray. Because of our depth. It is very important.
-
Re: Depth
I completely agree with the depth of this team. It's because of this that I disagree with those that say preseason doesn't matter. While I don't put much stock in the 1st half, I do put a lot in the 2nd half. This is where the real game begins. These are the guys that are going all out to make the team. If your backups constantly play the other team's backups it means you have depth. It's why when injuries occurr the Ravens always have the "Next Man Up". It means when your starters are on the sideline taking a breather there's not a lot of drop off. It's why the Ravens are a perennial playoff team.
-
08-16-2013, 11:51 AM #10Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Posts
- 340
Re: Depth
Ravens did the same thing last year. Once the starters for both teams left the Ravens dominated the preseason games. Same thing this year. I would not rule out a trade for a TE either.
-
Re: Depth
Last couple years we've had good depth.
Have to give our scouts a ton of credit...in addition to the reports and recommendations to Ozzie for the draft, they truly do an absolutely amazing job finding UDFA's annually. Props guys for a way too often under appreciated, stressful and hard job.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD,Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.
-
Re: Depth
It's reached the point where we rarely even worry about players drafted in the first three rounds. Our arguments have mainly taken place over mid-late round guys and UDFAs', because we're starting to become accustomed to them making the team and even producing in some cases.
"Please take with you this final sword, The Excellector. I am praying that your journey will be guided by the light", Leon Shore
Bookmarks