Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 25 to 36 of 87
  1. #25

    Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?



    Quote Originally Posted by Money227 View Post
    The "crying about it" doesn't refer to the difference of opinion, it refers to the continual regurgitation of the difference of opinion. It just gets old to some people. That's all I'm saying (and it's my opinion). Hell...maybe I'm wrong and we actually haven't talked about the Boldin trade enough.
    It's going to be a rough season for you then...because it's going to be brought up on message boards, pregame shows, during Ravens and 49er games and in media columns as well and not just by the people you feel are "crying about it".
    Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.




  2. #26

    Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Excellector View Post
    Brandon Stokely can give you the regular season production that Boldin gave you, especially with Caldwell calling the plays, at a small fraction of the price.
    How do you know that since Boldin barely got any time with Caldwell calling the plays? Boldin looked like 90 catch, 1300 yard guy during those games with Caldwell in the playoffs.
    Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.




  3. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    over by the dental floss bush
    Posts
    15,465
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?

    Quote Originally Posted by Money227 View Post
    The "crying about it" doesn't refer to the difference of opinion, it refers to the continual regurgitation of the difference of opinion. It just gets old to some people. That's all I'm saying (and it's my opinion). Hell...maybe I'm wrong and we actually haven't talked about the Boldin trade enough.
    Maybe you didn't see the link but the whole point of this thread is because of what Oz said and was just reported today. It's not regurgitation
    World Domination 3 Points at a Time!




  4. #28

    Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?

    TL's inspiration must have come from reading the board.
    The way many Ravens fans are whining about the departure of Anquan Boldin is like a bunch of scorned women at a wedding shower bellyaching about men.Get over it!Anquan Boldin is gone!He’s not coming back!Oh and by the way, it was THE RIGHT THING TO DO!
    http://russellstreetreport.com/sayin...-right-choice/

    That pretty much sums it up.




  5. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The Land of Verdite
    Posts
    12,094
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?

    Quote Originally Posted by Raveninwoodlawn View Post
    How do you know that since Boldin barely got any time with Caldwell calling the plays? Boldin looked like 90 catch, 1300 yard guy during those games with Caldwell in the playoffs.
    I am basing it off of what Boldin did under Cameron. That's what we're really used to. It won't be hard for Stokely to match that, or even do better than that. The Ravens have a better offensive line and coordinator. That production can be duplicated and surpassed.
    "When questioned, the Elders explained that they were in search of magical powers. However, they're actually searching for the whereabouts of a certain ring. This ring is a legendary treasure that long ago was known to exist"




  6. #30

    Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?

    Quote Originally Posted by Raveninwoodlawn View Post
    It's going to be a rough season for you then...because it's going to be brought up on message boards, pregame shows, during Ravens and 49er games and in media columns as well and not just by the people you feel are "crying about it".
    Actually...I think it will diminish greatly when the Ravens continue to win football games.




  7. #31

    Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?

    Quote Originally Posted by Raveninwoodlawn View Post
    Sure...if you turn specific statements like "I dont agree woth this move" into "we are going to suck" in your own mind.

    Some people get so incredibly defensive and appalled that someone dares to disagree with a single move, that those people completely go off the deep end and turn it into a bunch of "you dont believe in this team or Ozzie" nonsense.
    Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

    This is a funny statement considering your are doing the same thing you are accusing me of.




  8. #32

    Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Excellector View Post
    I am basing it off of what Boldin did under Cameron. That's what we're really used to. It won't be hard for Stokely to match that, or even do better than that. The Ravens have a better offensive line and coordinator. That production can be duplicated and surpassed.
    So what should we expect from Joe since what we're used to is what he did under Cameron?

    Only Joe, Pitta, and Torrey should be expected to benefit from Caldwell?

    That better coordinator turned Boldin back IMO a star just 6-7 months ago.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
    Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.




  9. #33

    Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?

    Quote Originally Posted by Money227 View Post
    Actually...I think it will diminish greatly when the Ravens continue to win football games.
    The proof will be in the pudding, I agree with that.

    I'll say this also...look at the original post on this thread. It wasn't started by one of the dissenters...and the other threads weren't either. The original posts in these threads invites this discussion.

    I


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
    Last edited by Raveninwoodlawn; 08-12-2013 at 05:05 PM.
    Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.




  10. #34

    Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?

    Quote Originally Posted by dscola31 View Post
    This is a funny statement considering your are doing the same thing you are accusing me of.
    Not really. The first paragraph in that post was the epitome of twisting words completely around.

    Who has expressed or implied that the team is going to stink, or that we aren't going to win games? Who has even said that Ozzie's moves were dumb or even that they didn't make sense.

    What I, and others have said, is that in our opinion, other moves may have just made more sense to us.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
    Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.




  11. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX Y'all
    Posts
    23,353

    Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigfish View Post
    TL's inspiration must have come from reading the board.

    http://russellstreetreport.com/sayin...-right-choice/

    That pretty much sums it up.
    +1

    The Boldin issue is quickly becoming the days when Boller was debated on an almost weekly basis.
    WARNING: This post may contain material offensive to those who lack wit, humor, common sense and/or supporting factual or anecdotal evidence. All statements and assertions contained herein may be subject to literary devices not limited to: irony, metaphor, allusion and dripping sarcasm.




  12. #36

    Re: Boldin Replaced by Durmervil and Huff?

    Quote Originally Posted by Raveninwoodlawn View Post
    Not really. The first paragraph in that post was the epitome of twisting words completely around.

    Who has expressed or implied that the team is going to stink, or that we aren't going to win games? Who has even said that Ozzie's moves were dumb or even that they didn't make sense.

    What I, and others have said, is that in our opinion, other moves may have just made more sense to us.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
    But what I said was people I have spoken to. Meaning diferent fans of the team. This is not the only place Raven fans exist so you taking what I said personally and getting defensive is again, ironic being that you are accusing me of doing the same thing.




Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russell Street Report Website Design by D3Corp Ocean City Maryland