Results 61 to 72 of 172
Thread: Tight End Options Going Forward
-
07-28-2013, 07:48 AM #61Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 4,464
Re: Tight End Options Going Forward
I don't think that analogy applies at all. First-off, if "going down the shitter" means making the playoffs - like they did in 2001, where anything can happen, then where do I sign? Second, what hurt about the Jamal injury was that the team did not have viable back-up at running back. Newsome said later that would never be the case again - and it hasn't. With regards to this injury, Dixon is a viable replacement who hasn't really gotten an opportunity as the #1 TE. Personally, I have seen enough of his play to feel confident in giving him a shot. He's in a contract year, so he has every incentive to step up.
Flacco is the starting QB of the defending champions and whether you think he's "elite" or not, his job (and Caldwell's) is to seemlessly integrate whoever replaces Pitta into the offense without skipping a beat. That is what Brady, Bree's, and the Manning's do year after year.
Let's just hope the Ravens don't suffer anymore major injuries.
And most importantly, let's hope Pitta makes a full recovery.
-
Re: Tight End Options Going Forward
BTW...regarding Dallas Clark...
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1...s-unsurprising
It's a bleacher report article, but it gives statistical facts to back up why he isn't good anymore.
Also, google "Dallas Clark dropped passes" and a ton of articles regarding his final seasons in Indy pop up.
He's not good
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HDAlthough Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.
-
07-28-2013, 08:15 AM #63Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 4,464
Re: Tight End Options Going Forward
I don't think Newsome will make a move right now. I think he will let the pre-season play out for a few weeks to see how Dixon responds and, if necessary, I can see a trade right before the final cut-down for mid-level TE that may be caught up in a numbers situation with another team.
-
07-28-2013, 08:18 AM #64
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- where my head touches the pillow
- Posts
- 45,519
- Blog Entries
- 4
Re: Tight End Options Going Forward
I agree with the one poster that said bring in a legit # 2 wideout and quit bullshitting with Jacoby as legit reciever whos going to get 60-70 receptions. As far as bringing in a Vet TE whats the point? Clark is done, Shancoe is done, Heap is done they are all done its not like the talent isn't there, so what Furst is an undrafted rookie how many low round to undrafed guys have became core players on this team over the years? Thats what have made the Ravens successful..shit people done forgot who the fuck we have as a GM. Pitts is a big deal no doubt but we still have Dickson who is top flight if he can be consistent with his hands hes unstoppable and the talent is there with Juice and Furst, get a Vet legit vet WR and lets keep it moving or sign Leach
-
07-28-2013, 08:20 AM #65Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 262
-
07-28-2013, 08:24 AM #66
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- where my head touches the pillow
- Posts
- 45,519
- Blog Entries
- 4
Re: Tight End Options Going Forward
Im not on the loyd bandwagon either defintely not a flashy guy but loyd can ball he was beast in denver and in NE he made some very nice consistent catches but when you have Gronk and hernandez and welker there aint enough ball to go around for a guy like loyd. Not the greatest move but it wouldn't hurt plus he can stretch the field.
-
Re: Tight End Options Going Forward
If they don't sign shiancoe which looks like they had possible interest in to begin with, then this is definitely the route I think they take if hey sign one at all.
Losing Pitta sucks, but it ain't the end of the world as some would make it out to be.
Injurys happen to teams every year, yet some team still manages to deal with them and win the superbowl.
Look at the injurys we had last year, yet guys managed to step up, and the rest of the story we know.
Aren't many guys on this team whos role can't be filled in some capacity to compensate for their lose, Pitta ain't one of them.
Does losing Pitta make it more difficult to function? Absolutely!!
Does losing Pitta make us one dimensional, predictable and easy to defend to opposing defenses?:hammer:Will Die A Ravens Fan!!
-
Re: Tight End Options Going Forward
Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.
-
07-28-2013, 08:33 AM #69Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Houston, TX Y'all
- Posts
- 34,414
Re: Tight End Options Going Forward
Not sure why so many are dismissive about the team bringing in a veteran TE. This is more about scheme than replacing production at this point.
With Leach not back (yet) it looked obvious to me we were moving to more of a two TE set in terms of blocking on run situations. If the Ravens are truly moving in that direction, it's almost a lock they go after a vet TE.
Now maybe the injury to Pitta will force their hand and they go back to using a true FB as their main blocking option. But then they'd really need Leach, upping his price tag. You then limit yourself as to your price on a decent free agent WR.
I'm not saying it will definitely be one way or the other. But I have to think this is the discussion right now in Owings Mills.
-
07-28-2013, 08:41 AM #70
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- where my head touches the pillow
- Posts
- 45,519
- Blog Entries
- 4
Re: Tight End Options Going Forward
Clark, Shancoe and Heap shouldnt be in any conversations at all Clark is done been done Shancoe couldnt even see playing time on a team that loves their TEs especially when one is always hurt and Heap is simply done. At this point the only hand it may force is bringing in a legit WR with reliable hands to challenge for the slot or #2 spot.
-
Re: Tight End Options Going Forward
They need to bring in a body to compete and I think they will
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
World Domination 3 Points at a Time!
-
07-28-2013, 09:01 AM #72Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 262
Bookmarks