Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 44
  1. #13

    Re: Rodgers or Flacco?



    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenswintitle View Post
    here we go again with 'Caldwell's offense'
    ??? Are you questioning that there is a difference between Caldwell's offensive philosophy and Cameron's? Even if you think they are similar, a huge difference is in the execution, namely Caldwell seems much better at making in-game adjustments (see Jacksonville 2011 vs 2nd half of this year's AFC Championship game).

    To be clear, I think Flacco will do better under Caldwell. But to the point of this thread, Rogers is at another level. I am happy for now to consider Flacco a top-10 QB, considering that in the middle of last season many would have considered him average at best.




  2. #14

    Re: Rodgers or Flacco?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenswintitle View Post
    here we go again with 'Caldwell's offense'
    Lol, it's going to be a long season.

    The Packers offense is always good, I expect no different. Playing in the AFCN isn't the best division for obtaining impressive stats playing top ranked defenses twice a season. Joe just needs to play his game.




  3. #15

    Re: Rodgers or Flacco?

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnBKistler View Post
    Especially a receiver that really doesn't fit Caldwell's offense.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenswintitle View Post
    here we go again with 'Caldwell's offense'
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnBKistler View Post
    ??? Are you questioning that there is a difference between Caldwell's offensive philosophy and Cameron's? Even if you think they are similar, a huge difference is in the execution, namely Caldwell seems much better at making in-game adjustments (see Jacksonville 2011 vs 2nd half of this year's AFC Championship game).

    To be clear, I think Flacco will do better under Caldwell. But to the point of this thread, Rogers is at another level. I am happy for now to consider Flacco a top-10 QB, considering that in the middle of last season many would have considered him average at best.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvKIWjnEPNY

    Oh here you go, bringing class into it again.


    ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!




  4. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Eastern Shore
    Posts
    2,424

    Re: Rodgers or Flacco?

    Flacco
    "Screw it, let's ride"!




  5. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,959
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Rodgers or Flacco?

    Quote Originally Posted by GOTA View Post
    That's true but under Cam Flacco didn't do anything stat wise that really stood out. I'm betting on the fact that the addition of Caldwell outweighs the loss of any receiver for Flacco.
    Well, he was doing pretty damn good statistically in 2009 until he got injured against the Vikings. And he finished with a QBR of 93.




  6. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pasadena
    Posts
    9,192
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Rodgers or Flacco?

    James Jones, Jordy Nelson and Randall Cobb.

    Packers are stacked at WR.




  7. #19

    Re: Rodgers or Flacco?

    Look at the tape of last years games, Torrey already was getting the #1 CB almost always, and as I have posted several times, Boldin was a 4TD, 65 catch guy. He will not be missed. The combination of Dickson and Pitta, along with the young guys moving up the depth charts, will more than make up for the loss of Boldin. Joe will look like the guy most of us thought he could be, but Cam has been holding him back.




  8. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Middle River
    Posts
    3,139
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Rodgers or Flacco?

    Rodgers or Flacco?

    My answer has to be..... either.

    Yeah, I prefer Joe because I'm Baltimore and have watched him long and often, and haven't followed Rodgers as much or seen him anywhere close to Joe.

    But ask me which QB I want on my team? my answer is either one

    To quote Bum Phillips
    (about Don Shula) "He can take his'n and beat your'n and take your'n and beat his'n."

    Rodgers is a year older, and sat on the bench 3 years (got in 7 games), so they both basically became starting QBs in 2008. He is a year older than Joe and statistically a little ahead of Joe but that can be 3 yrs experience vs rookie (among other factors).
    But you can and will win often with either one.
    To be on a pedestal is to be in a corner




  9. #21

    Re: Rodgers or Flacco?

    Quote Originally Posted by HKusp View Post
    Look at the tape of last years games, Torrey already was getting the #1 CB almost always, and as I have posted several times, Boldin was a 4TD, 65 catch guy. He will not be missed. The combination of Dickson and Pitta, along with the young guys moving up the depth charts, will more than make up for the loss of Boldin. Joe will look like the guy most of us thought he could be, but Cam has been holding him back.
    I agree, and I think Jones is going to have his share of long TD's this year as well.




  10. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Formerly Carpetbaggerville (IND) --now back in MD
    Posts
    643
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Rodgers or Flacco?

    I mean we all love Joe but I have to admit its basically Rodgers and then the rest. Joe is right there around the top of the "rest" though. And I give GB FO credit for never missing a beat when they lose a WR or two. They've always got another guy waiting in the wings and he's usually just as productive as the one he replaced. They're almost to WRs what the Broncos are to RBs.
    They hate us..... but they want to BE us. (.... or at least poach all our players/coaches/FO people!)




  11. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Scaggsville, MD
    Posts
    777

    Re: Rodgers or Flacco?

    Quote Originally Posted by Paintballguy View Post
    James Jones, Jordy Nelson and Randall Cobb.

    Packers are stacked at WR.
    If we had these WRs, no one would be wondering how the loss of Boldin would affect us.




  12. #24

    Re: Rodgers or Flacco?

    The original post I made was as to Joe Flacco losing 1 WR in FA causing the Ravens hopes to be competitive next season evaporate, while Aaron Rodgers loses 2 WRs in FA and is right on track to make a deep playoff run. That has been answered already, so it's not a question of who would you chose as your teams QB, as much as why doesn't the national sports media talk the same way about the Packers after losing Jennings and Driver as much as they have the Ravens after losing Anquan Boldin?


    ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!




Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russell Street Report Website Design by D3Corp Ocean City Maryland