Results 37 to 48 of 107
Thread: Least favorite Raven
-
05-05-2013, 02:29 PM #37
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Monson MA, home of Tree House Brewing
- Posts
- 6,484
- Blog Entries
- 3
-
05-06-2013, 12:13 PM #38
Re: Least favorite Raven
Two things are wrong with this statement.
1) We got Oher, Kruger, and Lardarius Webb in the first three rounds of the 2009 draft.
It's not Oher or Kruger's fault they kept moving them around and not playing either player in their best role. Oher is a good RT, and will get better if they put him there and leave him there (as they seem like they've finally decided to do). Kruger just got a $40 Million contract for doing in one season what he should have been doing from the jump. I don't think he's worth the contract, but he's an excellent situational player. Webb is one of the best CBs in the league (when healthy). Additionally, there were only a handful of players drafted after Oher through the end of the 2nd round that are worth a crap, and one of them is Kruger, who we also drafted.
2) Eric DeCosta is a scrawny little dude. Telling him something unpopular (and inaccurate) to his face is some sort of crowning achievement?
-
05-06-2013, 12:22 PM #39Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 136
-
05-06-2013, 12:41 PM #40Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 8,743
-
05-06-2013, 01:02 PM #41
Re: Least favorite Raven
Woodley said it in a way that Flacco couldn't because he would have to go though pitt to do it, considering we still haven't beat pitt in the playoffs, I think so far he is right. Now, if the question were answered like this, "No, Flacco isn't good enough to win the SB under any circumstance, ever" ...... then I would have to agree.
::Flacco Superstar::
-
05-06-2013, 01:03 PM #42
Re: Least favorite Raven
Also, my least favorite active Raven is Dickson, he has all the makings of an uncoverable TE, but his hands are awful.
::Flacco Superstar::
-
05-06-2013, 01:52 PM #43
Re: Least favorite Raven
I think too much is made about Dickson's potential. He has good size and speed, but he's not that exceptional.
40 Times and size of TEs:
Dickson 4.59 - 6'4" 255
Pitta 4.63 - 6'4" 245
Furstenburg 4.62 - 6'3" 242
When you look at the numbers his speed and size advantage is marginal over Pitta or Furstenburg. He's athletic, but far from a freak athlete like a Vernon Davis who ran a 4.38 40 or has a physical advantage a guy like Gronkowski has to out muscle DBs. Bottom line is he has disappointed on the field while Pitta has excelled. He needs to step it up this year.
-
I don't buy the age excuse because he's only one year older. 24 year olds still do the same dumb things 23 year olds do.
He's not 30 looking back at 23...he's 24 looking back at 23.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HDAlthough Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.
-
05-06-2013, 02:24 PM #45Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- New York City
- Posts
- 37,642
- Blog Entries
- 4
-
05-06-2013, 04:22 PM #46Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 136
-
05-06-2013, 04:38 PM #47Hall Of Fame Poster
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 8,743
-
05-06-2013, 10:00 PM #48Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 136
Bookmarks