Results 61 to 72 of 147
Thread: Is having a great LT overrated?
-
-
04-23-2013, 12:45 PM #62
Re: Is having a great LT overrated?
Steve Palazzolo@StevePalazzolo29m
Pressure from left tackle has resulted in a Sack + FF 18 more times than pressure from RT since 2008. That's less than four per year"The Ravens are not taking Jimmy Smith at 26!" -- Me, the day before the 2011 Draft
"On their way to the podium, the Ravens FO is going to collectively step over my dead body and select...Breshad Perriman." -- Me, the day before the 2015 Draft
Missed it by That Much: The story of 'Get Smart' and the modern day Baltimore Ravens
@BigPlayReceiver
-
04-23-2013, 12:47 PM #63
Re: Is having a great LT overrated?
Related.
Aaron Wilson@RavensInsider39m
Kelechi osemele said he's down to 329 pounds working out to get quicker if he plays left tackle"The Ravens are not taking Jimmy Smith at 26!" -- Me, the day before the 2011 Draft
"On their way to the podium, the Ravens FO is going to collectively step over my dead body and select...Breshad Perriman." -- Me, the day before the 2015 Draft
Missed it by That Much: The story of 'Get Smart' and the modern day Baltimore Ravens
@BigPlayReceiver
-
-
-
04-23-2013, 02:17 PM #66
Re: Is having a great LT overrated?
Totally agree, but if teams consistently protect and scheme against "left side risk" yet more sacks + FF's (albeit a small difference) are occurring from the left side then that raises the questions what's going on with the RDE or ROLB, and what's "not going on" with the LT? And how do scheme and backfield protection weigh in?
Just thoughts and questions of a data nerd...not sure if I'm making sense, but hell, it might just come down to individual match-ups like most everything else in the game."The Ravens are not taking Jimmy Smith at 26!" -- Me, the day before the 2011 Draft
"On their way to the podium, the Ravens FO is going to collectively step over my dead body and select...Breshad Perriman." -- Me, the day before the 2015 Draft
Missed it by That Much: The story of 'Get Smart' and the modern day Baltimore Ravens
@BigPlayReceiver
-
Re: Is having a great LT overrated?
UM. re-read the posts.
I referenced the last 4 SB LTs saying that all were all pros except Beatty who was very physical and very good according to the link I posted. I also listed Ryan Clady as a current and 3-time pro bowler who protected Manning well and well vs us in the playoffs.
Of course the Blind Side is about his history but the beginning of the book talks directly about the importance of the blind side. Then it gets into his history.
Re-read the book too.
I really love how people say the game has changed liked JO couldn't play in today's game and he's only been out a few years.
Hell, Raymond Berry and Tom Matte could play in todays game which is supposed to be so much faster and bigger and they were slow as molasses. I posted a vid of Berry
catching TDs in the 50s and 60s and he was slow as hell but he always got opened and he always scored and JO would still knock the shit out of people today.
So would Jim Parker, the HOF LT for the Baltimore Colts of the 50s and 60s.Last edited by AirFlacco; 04-23-2013 at 04:43 PM.
-
Re: Is having a great LT overrated?
If LTs were so um useless, Oher would still be playing there. Here's a stat that says
he tied for third most sacks in NFL and he allowed tons of pressures and QB hits. Film Study included them all in his grading system.
http://newsle.com/article/0/61468937/
-
Re: Is having a great LT overrated?
I don't think anyone is saying LTs are unimportant, just that having a great LT may not be as necessary as in the past. And I say pfffft to all of these data crunchers who want to attribute a stat to an Olineman when it could have been the QB, the receiver, missed block by TE, etc that caused the sack. Just my humble opinion
World Domination 3 Points at a Time!
-
Re: Is having a great LT overrated?
Maybe but as one of the links I posted said, the top LTs in the draft go in the top 5
spots so somebody wants them. Everyone here knows that none of them will fall to
us and any that are will be 2d or 3d teir and their arms will be so short.
I posted the entire list of LTs in the draft and first thing Film Study wanted to know was
their arm lengths. He always said that was Oher's problem and so did other experts.
The opposition always wrapped their arms around his shorter ones like wrestlers and threw him down. He always tried to wrestle guys instead of using his hands as stun
guns like JO did.
Footwork is also important and his was bad and so was KOs at RT. That's why they
switched him to LG.
Someone just posted he's losing weight and working on his footwork. I bet that
the new coach Castillo who coached all those great lines in Philly is working with KO
and sees something in him but that is just a guess.
If anyone can make a LT out of KO, it's Castillo.
Great discussion.
-
Re: Is having a great LT overrated?
Well, of course the top LT's go early in the draft. They also happen to be some of the best players available. No one is saying that a top tiered LT isn't desirable. I would LOVE to see Eric Fisher or Luke Jockel in a Ravens uniform. It just isn't in the cards though. Again, you almost always HAVE to be picking in the top 10-12 selections to really have a crack at a legitimate LT prospect. And there are a number of teams with solid players at the LT position who year in and year out don't have post-season success and end up picking in the top 10 (Cleveland, Oakland, Jacksonville, etc).
Originally Posted by AirFlacco
Originally Posted by AirFlacco
Originally Posted by AirFlaccoDisclaimer: The content posted is of my own opinion.
-
Bookmarks