Results 1 to 12 of 147
Thread: Is having a great LT overrated?
Threaded View
-
Re: Is having a great LT overrated?
Message board "wannabe" huh?
Using this draft (or any for that matter) as the litmus test for whether or not the LT position is overrated is mind numbingly dumb.
Maybe...*gasp*...just maybe the OL'men in this draft were some of the best players available in this draft?
Consider the 2012 NFL draft. Matt Kalil goes #4 overall to the Vikings. The next LT prospect taken...scratch that...the next OFFENSIVE LINEMAN taken? Reilly Reif at pick 23 to the Lions. The next OT prospect taken? Mitchell Schwartz to the Browns in round 2.
Why? Because the other players were better value and/or better prospects. That's why.
Message board wannabe's...haha. Right.
You're just so hellbent on hating you some Michael Oher that you keep breezing over the fact that several people in this thread (and others), including me, have acknowledged that if you have the chance to take one of the top LT prospects - and they're one of the best players available - you do it. However, no matter what you may think or mockingly post on this forum, not having a top flight LT does not means that the team is destined for failure.Last edited by wickedsolo; 04-26-2013 at 07:19 AM.
Disclaimer: The content posted is of my own opinion.
Bookmarks