Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst ... 2345678910 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 151
  1. #76

    Re: We need a beast WR



    Quote Originally Posted by Paintballguy View Post
    Out of those guys, I would go with Eifert. Then, run 2 TE sets with Pitta and Eifert like the Pats use Gronk and Hernandez.
    Yeah, I think this would be a great move. Eifert is not really a guy who is seen as being in play at #32, but with teams like the Bears, Rams, Dolphins, and Falcons all satisfying their immediate TE needs, Eifert could easily slide on draft day.

    The Ravens have no TEs under contract after 2013. That qualifies as a BIG need to me, much more so than people are making it out to be, and I think we'll be using less I-formation and more 2TE/H-Back sets, similar to the Patriots as you said.

    Hell, the Patriots even ran 3TE sets last year, and the Ravens could do that too. Eifert plays in-line, with Dickson out wide and Pitta in the slot (or vice versa). Torrey goes deep to draw coverage, Eifert and Dickson stretch the seams, and Pitta and Rice run free over the middle... you can also run well out of that set.




  2. #77
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    San Dimas, CA
    Posts
    7,801

    Re: We need a beast WR

    Rodney Smith of Florida State is the "beastliest" WR in the draft in terms of measurables - he's 6'5",225 lbs, and runs a 4.43. However, I wouldn't draft him in the first 5 or 6 rounds. Brandon Kaufman of Eastern Washington is 6'5", 220 lbs and runs a 4.60, and I would probably take him before Rodney Smith, but once again, that's a late round pick at best. There is a lot more than just looking at height, weight and speed when considering an impact receiver.

    Personally, my favorites for a bigger receiver in rounds 2 or 3 are (in no particular order), Robert Woods, Da'Rick Rogers, Quintin Patton, DeAndre Hopkins. Guys in rounds 4-5 would be Chris Harper, Cobi Hamilton, Corey Fuller.

    Of course, if the Ravens ended up with Markus Wheaton, Ryan Swope or Aaron Dobson I wouldn't complain about it. There are a lot of decent receivers in the draft, especially in the 2-4 round range.




  3. #78
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pasadena
    Posts
    10,130
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: We need a beast WR

    Quote Originally Posted by bmorecareful View Post
    Yeah, I think this would be a great move. Eifert is not really a guy who is seen as being in play at #32, but with teams like the Bears, Rams, Dolphins, and Falcons all satisfying their immediate TE needs, Eifert could easily slide on draft day.

    The Ravens have no TEs under contract after 2013. That qualifies as a BIG need to me, much more so than people are making it out to be, and I think we'll be using less I-formation and more 2TE/H-Back sets, similar to the Patriots as you said.

    Hell, the Patriots even ran 3TE sets last year, and the Ravens could do that too. Eifert plays in-line, with Dickson out wide and Pitta in the slot (or vice versa). Torrey goes deep to draw coverage, Eifert and Dickson stretch the seams, and Pitta and Rice run free over the middle... you can also run well out of that set.
    And after the last time the Ravens won a superbowl, they drafted a pretty good TE at 32.




  4. #79

    Re: We need a beast WR

    Quote Originally Posted by bmorecareful View Post
    Good post. I, too, would squirm just a little bit if we took Keenan Allen with the 32nd pick. I have (like you) come to sweeten on him just a bit as I watched more of his tape, but I still don't really see a first-round receiver skill-set in him. Don't get me wrong, he's got athletic ability in spades, but his technique is way, way outside the 1st round. How is he going to handle being asked to run a full route tree instead of just slants, digs, curls, etc? How is he going to handle getting pressed at the line and having to make catches in traffic and against tight man coverage?

    I would not take Keenan Allen over Matt Elam, Alec Ogletree, Tyler Eifert, or DeAndre Hopkins. I have a good feeling one of those 4 players will be there for the Ravens to pull the trigger on. If they don't take Hopkins in the 1st (which is understandable, might be a slight reach, definitely not the "value" pick the Ravens usually prefer in the 1st) I've been pegging Rogers as a 3rd-round target that would likely require a trade up for the Ravens, but his value might be higher than that in the eyes of a lot of teams. There's just too much Julio Jones in him to prevent him for sliding too much. If he's there at #62 I would probably have to bite the bullet and take him.
    I've been thinking this same exact thing recently, me and BPR were just talking about how much better he looks as a route runner then we expected. Read somewhere that while he was at UT teams stop pressing him because he was just too strong and easily got off the jam, and we are talking SEC corners.




  5. #80
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    8,180
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: We need a beast WR

    Quote Originally Posted by Paintballguy View Post
    And after the last time the Ravens won a superbowl, they drafted a pretty good TE at 32.
    Not to knit-pick, but Heap was #31 IIRC... Bc




  6. #81
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Scaggsville, MD
    Posts
    1,057

    Re: We need a beast WR

    It is hard to get a player like this when you're constantly drafting so late in the first round.

    Cue my usual rant about how disappointing it was to not get Dez Bryant when we had a shot at him.




  7. #82

    Re: We need a beast WR

    Knowing Ozzie he already has someone on the radar....maybe a pro who has a good chance of getting cut when the inevitable purges start late in the summer.
    Way Down South in New Orleans




  8. #83
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    over by the dental floss bush
    Posts
    17,949
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: We need a beast WR

    Quote Originally Posted by GOTA View Post
    Are you in favor of signing Victor Cruz?
    I am not sure the Ravens could afford him but it's a head scratcher to me why other teams with cap space wouldn't make this move. Especially if they are mid round or lower. There is no way they'll get anyone as good in the draft that can come in and play at a high level right away.

    Why wouldn't someone like Dolphins, Cinci, Minnesota, Houston or New England go get this guy? It's like an unwritten rule...
    World Domination 3 Points at a Time!




  9. #84
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    San Dimas, CA
    Posts
    7,801

    Re: We need a beast WR

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenswintitle View Post
    I am not sure the Ravens could afford him but it's a head scratcher to me why other teams with cap space wouldn't make this move. Especially if they are mid round or lower. There is no way they'll get anyone as good in the draft that can come in and play at a high level right away....
    Right, but as a restricted free agent with a 1st round tender, a team would have to negotiate a salary (which the Giants would have the right to match), pay Cruz a bigger salary (with probably a bigger cap hit a few years down the line than a first round pick), and lose a first round pick as well.




  10. #85
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    over by the dental floss bush
    Posts
    17,949
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: We need a beast WR

    Quote Originally Posted by alien bird View Post
    Right, but as a restricted free agent with a 1st round tender, a team would have to negotiate a salary (which the Giants would have the right to match), pay Cruz a bigger salary (with probably a bigger cap hit a few years down the line than a first round pick), and lose a first round pick as well.
    I understand but the teams I listed could do that. They could make him an offer that the Giants can't match. But it never seems to happen like there is a gentleman's agreement...
    World Domination 3 Points at a Time!




  11. #86

    Re: We need a beast WR

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenswintitle View Post
    I understand but the teams I listed could do that. They could make him an offer that the Giants can't match. But it never seems to happen like there is a gentleman's agreement...
    I don'tt hink it's a gentleman's agreement, I think it is the sufficiently highcost that is barrier to entry. Especially in light of the new Rookie wage scale, paying a first round pick AND a top end FA salary isn't that appealing, though, in a way, that is precisely what happenned with Percy Harvin. He wasn't a RFA, but similar in that after this coming year he was gone. IMO, that was the very worst move of the offseason for any time(looking from Seattle's perspective). With the pick they shipped to Minny, they could have gotten 4 years of Tavon Austin for a bit mroe hten one year of Harvin. IMO, Austin will be the better pro.




  12. #87
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    6,167
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: We need a beast WR

    Quote Originally Posted by alien bird View Post
    Right, but as a restricted free agent with a 1st round tender, a team would have to negotiate a salary (which the Giants would have the right to match), pay Cruz a bigger salary (with probably a bigger cap hit a few years down the line than a first round pick), and lose a first round pick as well.
    I've heard NYG only offered Cruz around $7M/year.

    Some people laughed at me when I said Cruz wouldn't be offered much more than Welker/Amendola. Well they averaged about $6M.

    $7M vs $6M. Pretty damn close.




  13. #88
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Northern Ireland, UK
    Posts
    2,812

    Re: We need a beast WR

    Quote Originally Posted by bt12483 View Post
    I've heard NYG only offered Cruz around $7M/year.

    Some people laughed at me when I said Cruz wouldn't be offered much more than Welker/Amendola. Well they averaged about $6M.

    $7M vs $6M. Pretty damn close.
    well he hasn't signed that so his price could still go up




  14. #89

    Re: We need a beast WR

    Quote Originally Posted by bmorecareful View Post
    Yeah, I think this would be a great move. Eifert is not really a guy who is seen as being in play at #32, but with teams like the Bears, Rams, Dolphins, and Falcons all satisfying their immediate TE needs, Eifert could easily slide on draft day.

    The Ravens have no TEs under contract after 2013. That qualifies as a BIG need to me, much more so than people are making it out to be, and I think we'll be using less I-formation and more 2TE/H-Back sets, similar to the Patriots as you said.

    Hell, the Patriots even ran 3TE sets last year, and the Ravens could do that too. Eifert plays in-line, with Dickson out wide and Pitta in the slot (or vice versa). Torrey goes deep to draw coverage, Eifert and Dickson stretch the seams, and Pitta and Rice run free over the middle... you can also run well out of that set.

    Love the idea of drafting Eifert. He would be an upgrade over Q. He is bigger and faster at this point in their careers. He catches contested balls. He can work outside and in. He and Pitta would make a great combo.




  15. #90
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    San Dimas, CA
    Posts
    7,801

    Re: We need a beast WR

    Quote Originally Posted by arnie_uk View Post
    well he hasn't signed that so his price could still go up
    Or, he loses about $4M when no one signs him and he plays out the season for the $2M tender.




Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russell Street Report Website Design by D3Corp Ocean City Maryland