Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 114
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,137
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: I'll come right out and say it: I don't want Ed Reed back



    Hopefully Woodson being on the market lowers Reed's price and allows us to retain him.

    I expect Reed to go, personally. I think the Patriots or Colts will outbid us because they could use a veteran leader for one or two years to get their secondaries to another level. Reed loves both coaches and they're both competitive teams. The Colts as I understand have quite a bit of cap room, not sure about the Pats.

    If we don't draft Elam or Vaccaro, I think we snatch Glover Quin. I like the idea of calling up one or two guys from our farm team every year.

    Omar Brown is also an interesting prospect to watch.




  2. #32

    Re: I'll come right out and say it: I don't want Ed Reed back

    Quote Originally Posted by camdenyard View Post
    I want him back but only if his contract doesn't hamstring us.

    The test will be if Harbs and Ozzie wants him back. If they do, that's good enough for me.




  3. #33

    Re: I'll come right out and say it: I don't want Ed Reed back

    Love Ed like most of you. Favorite player to ever play for the Ravens (Ogden close and Ray was a little much for me at times) but I agree as well. I think anyone who watched Reed this season could see his limitations when it comes to tackling or any physical contact. Every instance of contact resulted in him crumpled to the ground; it was uncomfortable to watch at times. Love the guy but I hope he hangs them up.




  4. #34

    Re: I'll come right out and say it: I don't want Ed Reed back

    Reed is the QB of the secondary, that group of overacheivers that beat Andrew Luck, Payton Manning, Brady and Kaepernick in a row.
    We can't break the bank for Ed, but we are a much better team with him on it, than without.
    Now if its Ed or the Saints LT, you might bend my ear, otherwise I am leaning toward the Honey Badger.
    Way Down South in New Orleans




  5. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pasadena
    Posts
    10,130
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: I'll come right out and say it: I don't want Ed Reed back

    I want Reed back, but I doubt he'll be back.




  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The Land of Verdite
    Posts
    13,373
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: I'll come right out and say it: I don't want Ed Reed back

    How much do we expect the front office to offer him?
    "When questioned, the Elders explained that they were in search of magical powers. However, they're actually searching for the whereabouts of a certain ring. This ring is a legendary treasure that long ago was known to exist"




  7. #37

    Re: I'll come right out and say it: I don't want Ed Reed back

    Quote Originally Posted by The Excellector View Post
    How much do we expect the front office to offer him?
    Oz usually lets the market dictate.......he will say, we want you back, how much will it cost?
    We will see what we can do.
    Isn't that the most honest way, when you know a player really wants to stay and you have a good relationship?
    The key there is having a good relationship, a business climate of good will.
    Way Down South in New Orleans




  8. #38

    Re: I'll come right out and say it: I don't want Ed Reed back

    Quote Originally Posted by The Excellector View Post
    How much do we expect the front office to offer him?
    Going off what Ravenanalytics said, I think Charles Woodson's release will lower the price for Reed. If Reed is looking for a pay day we can't offer him that. We just simply don't have enough money. If Reed is looking for another ring he won't leave. No way no how. I know there's been a lot of discussion lately about where Flacco ranks, but I think Flacco is the best QB in the AFC. He practices against Ed Reed every week and when he's on no defense can stop him.

    All that being said, I think Reed should be our number 2 priority in the off season behind Flacco. I love Ellerbe, Kruger and Cary...but this was their only good year. I mean before this season we were talking about possibly cutting Ellerbe, before last season it was Kruger. Ed Reed has been playing great for the past 10 years. During the playoffs Reed was hitting like his old self. I understand he won't do that during the regular season, but that's why we got Pollard. Reed makes everybody around him better. With Ray leaving we need Reed to be the QB of the defense.

    Also, we always talk about linebackers that played next to Ray, left our team, and then went on to do nothing. How about all those free safeties? Gary Baxter, Landry, Jimmy Leonhard. I don't know about y'all , but I'm a bit hesitant with my team parting ways with the best safety that has ever played. Age is just a number especially at a position like safety.




  9. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Scaggsville, MD
    Posts
    1,059

    Re: I'll come right out and say it: I don't want Ed Reed back

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenalytics View Post
    This post is amazingly wordy. I can't believe it took so long to say so little. I felt like I just sat through the State of the Union.

    I think the key thing is to remember that we have a philosophy that's gotten us here - "Right player, right price." At some point, you're right, the economic cost of keeping Reed will outweigh the benefits, but I think you're being too abstract in accusing a relatively moderate salary of $3M causing us to lose "a younger piece of the puzzle."

    Let's look at the last few years, especially this year. How many defensive backs have we seen come and go? Josh Wilson, Lardarius Webb, Cary Williams, Jimmy Smith, Laron Landry, Zibi, Pollard, Naka, to name a few. All of them, when in our secondary, have played above expectations (see Jimmy's performance, finally healthy, in the SB). Landry, Zibi, Pollard, and Wilson are not anything special on other teams. Lardarius Webb was unheard of. Cary Williams came from the practice squad.

    Do you see a trend? Reed is a rock that coaches and manages the secondary to play at a completely different level. It's just the same way we are able to plug-in damn near every linebacker next to Ray Lewis and have them play above their expectations. There's a reason why the current reigning "Smartest Guy in the Room" Bill Belichick loves Reed. He's no fool. You see this in our rival, the Steelers. How much worse is their defense without 43? Likewise I wouldn't be surprised to see Green Bay's secondary defense take a step back with Woodson out.

    I agree that you can't overpay Reed and sacrifice the young talent. But you make it sound like ALL our young players are worth more than Reed, and you can't say that.
    You're falling prey to exactly the sort of thinking that I hope our front office avoids. Absolutely, we've surrounded Reed with a huge variety of different players in the secondary. He's been the constant presence there for a decade, and helped some of those players overachieve, players who later went elsewhere and had some of their flaws exposed. Just like Ray Lewis was the stalwart while we let guys like Hartwell and Bart Scott get their money elsewhere.

    But that decade is gone, man. 24-year-old Ed Reed is not walking through that door any time soon. It was a great run, ultimately got us to a title, but assuming that he'll have that same impact over the next 2-3 years when his play on the field can't keep up with his knowledge of the game is foolish.

    The Steelers have huge money tied up in Polamalu and now thanks to injuries he hasn't even seen the field much these past couple years. That's what happens to safeties. They fly all over the field make huge hits at high speeds and their bodies break down. Ed Reed's been able to tough through his injuries, mostly because he can still run, can still put himself in position to be close to the action. But what happens when he gets there? Sometimes he drops the pick. Sometimes he slams into a receiver with terrible form and lets the guy bounce right off and run past him. Sometimes he wraps up and gets dragged 6-8 yards before the player goes down. These things matter.

    And all reports indicate that Reed is likely to receive interest at least from New England and Indianapolis, if not elsewhere. That isn't likely to equate to him taking a bargain deal to remain in purple. If he was only seeing interest from the Clevelands and Jacksonvilles of the NFL, that might be different, but those are playoff teams with championship aspirations of their own. He could see himself as the guy to put them over that hump.

    Who would you give up to keep Ed Reed, if you had to? Boldin? Jacoby? Leach? Those are all important cogs of the offense that is going to lead us into the next era of Ravens football. I'd rather see Reed's money go towards shoring up the LT position and keeping our offensive linemen in their current places, whether that means bringing back McKinnie, or better yet, finding a competent LT in the rich FA market and giving him a reasonable deal.

    Right player, right price is the way to go. And the right price for Ed Reed is far lower than what the market is going to pay. So we shouldn't be the ones to pay it.




  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Venice Florida
    Posts
    273

    Re: I'll come right out and say it: I don't want Ed Reed back

    Mentally he is still first rate. Physically he is done. See Ya.




  11. #41

    Re: I'll come right out and say it: I don't want Ed Reed back

    Quote Originally Posted by Gabrosin View Post
    Y And the right price for Ed Reed is far lower than what the market is going to pay. So we shouldn't be the ones to pay it.
    What are you a swami or something?
    Can you look into your crystal ball and tell me something else?
    Way Down South in New Orleans




  12. #42
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    13,453
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: I'll come right out and say it: I don't want Ed Reed back

    Manning and Brady agree with the OP and so does every offense in the NFL.

    FOX kept Manning from throwing in the 4th qtr in Denver because he was scared of Reed. He didn't even trust Manning. So there's the
    great Manning handing off because he was afraid of Ed.

    So now there's a fan who wants to off Ed, just like all those guys who didn't like Joe.

    Some people. Geesh.
    Last edited by AirFlacco; 02-17-2013 at 01:23 PM.




  13. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Arbutus
    Posts
    1,875

    Re: I'll come right out and say it: I don't want Ed Reed back

    If we hadn't gone all the way, I could see him looking to go to someone else that was more of a perceived contender but now, he has his ring and has legacy to finish writing and this close to the end, I can see him wanting to finish it in purple. People may be surprised what he stays here for.




  14. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Scaggsville, MD
    Posts
    1,059

    Re: I'll come right out and say it: I don't want Ed Reed back

    Quote Originally Posted by AirFlacco View Post
    Manning and Brady agree with the OP and so does every offense in the NFL.

    FOX kept Manning from throwing in the 4th qtr in Denver because he was scared of Reed. He didn't even trust Manning. So there's the
    great Manning handing off because he was afraid of Ed.

    So now there's a fan who wants to off Ed, just like all those guys who didn't like Joe.

    Some people. Geesh.
    And we should be forever thankful that they let their fear of Reed's reputation lead them into bad playcalling decisions.




  15. #45
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The Land of Verdite
    Posts
    13,373
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: I'll come right out and say it: I don't want Ed Reed back

    Come on y'all. Don't let the Super Bowl Championship blind from how bad it was for you to see the state of Ed Reed's game this season. By Ed Reed's standards, it was bad. Missing tackles, dropping picks, peeking in the backfield, calling himself disguising and leaving wide open running lanes.

    It was bad.
    "When questioned, the Elders explained that they were in search of magical powers. However, they're actually searching for the whereabouts of a certain ring. This ring is a legendary treasure that long ago was known to exist"




Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russell Street Report Website Design by D3Corp Ocean City Maryland