Results 1 to 12 of 32
-
02-08-2013, 10:49 AM #1Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 4,464
"Weeden is more talented than Flacco..."
As I said on the thread....if some of these Browns fans didn't exist, we would simply just have to make them up.
You can't buy entertainment this good...
http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=149&f=1547&t=11269544
-
02-08-2013, 10:57 AM #2
Re: "Weeden is more talented than Flacco..."
I love the latest downplay of Flacco's accomplishments now:
Originally Posted by Bitter, jealous Browns fan with a 28 year old rookie QB
-
Re: "Weeden is more talented than Flacco..."
Most posters I see are totally disagreeing with that out outrageous thread. Brandon Weeden is a career back up.
-
02-08-2013, 11:05 AM #4Hyperbolic curmudgeometer
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Balmer Merlin Hon
- Posts
- 5,854
- Blog Entries
- 1
Re: "Weeden is more talented than Flacco..."
I've often thought that a large subset of Clowns fans were inbred, & here's the proof--all descendants of the ancient snake-oil salesman D. Lou Shunawl...:D
-
Re: "Weeden is more talented than Flacco..."
Those Browns fans think everybody they don't like/plays for a rival/or is a guy they passed on in the draft is overrated.
This guy summed up that board perfectly...
Flacco is ordinary, Julio Jones sucks, Polamalu is overrated. Ah, the OBR...
oh, and I almost forgot- the NFL is fixed.
Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.
-
02-08-2013, 11:08 AM #6Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Pasadena
- Posts
- 14,123
- Blog Entries
- 4
Re: "Weeden is more talented than Flacco..."
I guess living in Ohio does that to you.
-
02-08-2013, 11:09 AM #7
Re: "Weeden is more talented than Flacco..."
Never get in a fight with a pig; you both get muddy, and the pig likes it...
-
02-08-2013, 11:12 AM #8Veteran Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 4,464
Re: "Weeden is more talented than Flacco..."
This would be hilarious enough if Weeden was a 22-year-old rookie...but remember, he's 2 1/2 years older than Flacco...heck, he's almost as old as Roethlisberger.
-
Re: "Weeden is more talented than Flacco..."
Weeden was a really dumb pick. Dude is going to be 30 in October. Guys 5 years younger than him ran circles around him this year.
They have a decent core on D, and Trent will be a thorn for us, but honestly they just seem to constantly be in rebuild mode.
-
02-08-2013, 11:13 AM #10Legendary RSR Poster
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Houston, TX Y'all
- Posts
- 34,414
Re: "Weeden is more talented than Flacco..."
Funny stuff for sure ....
But who in the thread is arguing that Weeden is more talented? I don't see it but then again I am on a conference call and simply scanning right now.
-
Re: "Weeden is more talented than Flacco..."
Joe Flacco- age 28 years-0 months, 63 NFL wins
Brandon Weeden age 29-4 months, 5 NFL wins
If Weeden even reaches 40 wins in his career, I'd be shocked.
-
02-08-2013, 11:15 AM #12
Re: "Weeden is more talented than Flacco..."
So stupid...
I wonder how Joe Montana looks without Jerry Rice... Brady without Welker/Moss.... P. Manning without Harrison/Wayne.... or E. Manning without Tyree or Manningham?
QB's make throws, WRs catch them...
Bookmarks